Skoda Octavia generations
(Boot space)Generation year | Boot space |
---|---|
Octavia, Model year 1997 (1.Generation) | 528 l |
Octavia, Model year 2000 (1.Generation (1. Facelift)) | 528 l |
Octavia, Model year 2004 (Octavia 2. Generation) | 560 l |
Octavia, Model year 2009 (Octavia 2. Generation (1. Facelift)) | 560 l |
Octavia, Model year 2013 (Octavia 3. Generation) | 590 l |
Octavia, Model year 2017 (Octavia 3. Generation (1. Facelift)) | 590 l |
Octavia, Model year 2020 (Octavia 4. Generation) | 600 l |
Octavia, Model year 2024 (Octavia 4. Generation (1. Facelift)) | 600 l |
Variants
Skoda Octavia variants: Octavia Combi vs. Octavia Limousine
(Boot space)Variant name | Boot space |
---|---|
Octavia Combi | 640 l |
Octavia Limousine | 600 l |
The boot space compared to other Skoda models
In Škoda's own family, the Octavia is like the resourceful big brother. Its closest sibling, the Škoda Scala, offers a sizable 467 liters, but next to the Octavia, it seems to be bringing a knife to a gunfight. Even the muscular Škoda Superb Combi, a veritable limousine of the range, falls behind with its mere 510 liters of boot volume. The Octavia stands defiant, only outdone by its own Combi version and performance model RS Combi variants—the estate versions that turn the boot space dial up to 640 liters.
Skoda Octavia vs other current cars by Skoda
(Boot space)Variant name | Boot space |
---|---|
Fabia | 380 l |
Kamiq | 400 l |
Scala | 467 l |
Superb Combi | 510 l |
Karoq Scout | 521 l |
Karoq | 521 l |
Enyaq Coupé | 570 l |
Enyaq RS Coupé | 570 l |
Enyaq iV Coupé | 570 l |
Enyaq iV RS Coupé | 570 l |
Enyaq | 585 l |
Enyaq RS | 585 l |
Enyaq iV | 585 l |
Octavia RS Limousine | 600 l |
Octavia Limousine | 600 l |
Superb Limousine | 625 l |
Octavia Combi | 640 l |
Octavia RS Combi | 640 l |
Octavia Scout | 640 l |
Kodiaq | 650 l |
Kodiaq RS | 650 l |
Kodiaq Scout | 650 l |
Superb Scout | 660 l |
How does the boot space of the Skoda Octavia compare to it's nearest competitors?
But how does this Czech champion stack against a European coalition of rivals? Take the elegant Swede, the Volvo 740/760, with 470 liters, it might have been the poster child of boot space once, but it now plays second fiddle. Or consider the Subaru Impreza's 395 liters, which shows that sometimes being fast doesn't mean you can bring all your stuff along for the ride. Even the French flair in the shape of the Peugeot 604, boasting 440 liters, bows before the Octavia's cavernous rear. Closest of all is the Talbot Tagora, with a trunk almost as roomy as a Škoda showroom at 569 liters, yet it still has to acknowledge the Octavia's supremacy. It seems the Octavia is not just keeping up with the Joneses; it's leaving them miles behind with their suitcases on the curb.
Skoda Octavia vs. similar cars
(Boot space)Car model | Boot space |
---|---|
VW Nutzfahrzeuge Crafter 2006 | 7500 l |
Ford Transit 1998 | 6300 l |
Nissan NV400 2010 | 2800 l |
Peugeot Traveller 2016 | 1624 l |
Citroen Spacetourer 2016 | 1624 l |
Land Rover Defender 1990 | 1600 l |
Toyota Proace 2016 | 1172 l |
Fiat Talento 2016 | 1000 l |
SsangYong Rexton 2003 | 935 l |
Land Rover Discovery 2002 | 880 l |
Skoda Octavia 2024 | 600 l |
Jaguar E-Pace 2018 | 577 l |
Mercedes-Benz E-Klasse 2002 | 540 l |
Opel Omega 1999 | 530 l |
Mercedes-Benz T-Klasse 2022 | 520 l |
Nissan Pathfinder 2005 | 515 l |
Volvo XC60 2008 | 495 l |
Toyota Previa 2000 | 495 l |
Citroen C-Crosser 2007 | 441 l |
Cadillac BLS 2006 | 425 l |
Peugeot 4008 2012 | 416 l |
Lancia Zeta 1995 | 340 l |
Lancia Phedra 2002 | 324 l |
Mercedes-Benz CLC-Klasse 2008 | 310 l |