MG TF engines
(Combined consumption (NEDC))| Engine | Combined consumption (NEDC) |
|---|---|
| 115 85 kW | 7.1 l/100km |
| 160 118 kW | 7.5 l/100km |
| 135 100 kW | 7.9 l/100km |
| 120 Stepspeed 88 kW | 8.3 l/100km |
1. 115 85 kW
7.1 l/100km
2. 160 118 kW
7.5 l/100km
3. 135 100 kW
7.9 l/100km
4. 120 Stepspeed 88 kW
8.3 l/100km
The combined consumption (nedc) compared to other MG models
MG TF vs other current cars by MG
(Combined consumption (NEDC))| Variant name | Combined consumption (NEDC) |
|---|---|
| TF 160 Spark 118 kW | 7.1 l/100km |
| ZR 160 118 kW | 7.5 l/100km |
| ZS 180 130 kW | 9.5 l/100km |
| ZT 190 2.5 V6 140 kW | 9.8 l/100km |
| ZT-T 190 2.5 V6 140 kW | 9.8 l/100km |
1. TF 160 Spark 118 kW
7.1 l/100km
2. ZR 160 118 kW
7.5 l/100km
3. ZS 180 130 kW
9.5 l/100km
4. ZT 190 2.5 V6 140 kW
9.8 l/100km
5. ZT-T 190 2.5 V6 140 kW
9.8 l/100km
How does the combined consumption (nedc) of the MG TF compare to it's nearest competitors?
MG TF vs. similar cars
(Combined consumption (NEDC))| Car model | Combined consumption (NEDC) |
|---|---|
| VW up! 1.0 2016 | 4.4 l/100km |
| Nissan Juke 1.0 DIG-T 117 2019 | 4.9 l/100km |
| Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost 2017 | 5.2 l/100km |
| Fiat 500X Cross 1.0 Firefly Turbo 2018 | 6.0 l/100km |
| Abarth 595 2016 | 6.0 l/100km |
| Mazda MX-5 SKYACTIV-G 160 2015 | 6.9 l/100km |
| MG TF 115 2002 | 7.1 l/100km |
| Morgan Plus Four 2.0 Turbo 2020 | 7.3 l/100km |
| Morgan Plus Six 3.0 Turbo 2019 | 7.4 l/100km |
1. VW up! 1.0 2016
4.4 l/100km
2. Nissan Juke 1.0 DIG-T 117 2019
4.9 l/100km
3. Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost 2017
5.2 l/100km
4. Fiat 500X Cross 1.0 Firefly Turbo 2018
6.0 l/100km
5. Abarth 595 2016
6.0 l/100km
6. Mazda MX-5 SKYACTIV-G 160 2015
6.9 l/100km
7. MG TF 115 2002
7.1 l/100km
8. Morgan Plus Four 2.0 Turbo 2020
7.3 l/100km
9. Morgan Plus Six 3.0 Turbo 2019
7.4 l/100km
