Comparison: combined consumption (NEDC) Ford Ranger vs. competitors 2024

1.Generation 1999
Ranger 1. Generation (1. Facelift) 2002
2.Generation 2007
2.Generation (1. Facelift) 2009
Ranger 3. Generation 2011
Ranger 3. Generation (1. Facelift) 2016
Ranger 3. Generation (2. Facelift) 2019
Ranger 4. Generation 2022

Table of contents:

Ford Ranger - What is the combined consumption (nedc) of different engines?

Ford Ranger engines

(Combined consumption (NEDC))
Ford Ranger engines
EngineCombined consumption (NEDC)
Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 {automatic} 125 kW0.0 l/100km
Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 125 kW0.0 l/100km
Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 151 kW0.0 l/100km
Extrakabine 2.0 EcoBlue Tremor e-4WD {automatic} 151 kW0.0 l/100km
Raptor 2.0 EcoBlue e-4WD {automatic} 154 kW0.0 l/100km
Doppelkabine 3.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 177 kW0.0 l/100km
Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW0.0 l/100km
1. Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 {automatic} 125 kW 0.0 l/100km
2. Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 125 kW 0.0 l/100km
3. Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 151 kW 0.0 l/100km
4. Extrakabine 2.0 EcoBlue Tremor e-4WD {automatic} 151 kW 0.0 l/100km
5. Raptor 2.0 EcoBlue e-4WD {automatic} 154 kW 0.0 l/100km
6. Doppelkabine 3.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 177 kW 0.0 l/100km
7. Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 212 kW 0.0 l/100km

Variants

Ford Ranger variants: Ranger vs. Ranger Raptor

(Combined consumption (NEDC))
Combined consumption (NEDC): Ford Ranger variants
Variant nameCombined consumption (NEDC)
Ranger0.0 l/100km
Ranger Raptor0.0 l/100km
1. Ranger 0.0 l/100km
2. Ranger Raptor 0.0 l/100km

The combined consumption (nedc) compared to other Ford models

Ford Ranger vs other current cars by Ford

(Combined consumption (NEDC))
Combined consumption (NEDC): Ranger vs. other models by Ford
Variant nameCombined consumption (NEDC)
Focus Turnier Turnier 1.0 EcoBoost Trend 63 kW4.1 l/100km
Transit Connect Kombi {VAN} 210 L2 1.5 EcoBlue Basis 55 kW4.5 l/100km
Fiesta ST 1.5 EcoBoost Styling-Paket 147 kW4.7 l/100km
EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line 103 kW5.2 l/100km
Transit Courier {VAN} {VAN} 1.5 TDCi Limited 55 kW5.3 l/100km
Transit Courier Kombi {VAN} 1.5 TDCi Limited 55 kW5.8 l/100km
Tourneo Courier 1.0 EcoBoost Ambiente 74 kW5.8 l/100km
Transit Kombi Kombi 350 L2 2.0 TDCi Trend 77 kW6.0 l/100km
Kuga 2.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp Titanium 4x4 {automatic} 178 kW6.3 l/100km
Transit Custom Kombi Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW6.3 l/100km
Tourneo Custom 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 136 kW6.3 l/100km
Transit Custom {VAN} Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW6.4 l/100km
Transit Custom Kombi Nugget Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW6.8 l/100km
Ranger Extrakabine 2.0 TDCi Stormtrak 4x4 {automatic} 156 kW6.9 l/100km
Mustang Convertible Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost {automatic} 213 kW9.1 l/100km
Mustang Fastback Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost {automatic} 213 kW12.4 l/100km
1. Focus Turnier Turnier 1.0 EcoBoost Trend 63 kW 4.1 l/100km
2. Transit Connect Kombi {VAN} 210 L2 1.5 EcoBlue Basis 55 kW 4.5 l/100km
3. Fiesta ST 1.5 EcoBoost Styling-Paket 147 kW 4.7 l/100km
4. EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line 103 kW 5.2 l/100km
5. Transit Courier {VAN} {VAN} 1.5 TDCi Limited 55 kW 5.3 l/100km
6. Transit Courier Kombi {VAN} 1.5 TDCi Limited 55 kW 5.8 l/100km
7. Tourneo Courier 1.0 EcoBoost Ambiente 74 kW 5.8 l/100km
8. Transit Kombi Kombi 350 L2 2.0 TDCi Trend 77 kW 6.0 l/100km
9. Kuga 2.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp Titanium 4x4 {automatic} 178 kW 6.3 l/100km
10. Transit Custom Kombi Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW 6.3 l/100km
11. Tourneo Custom 320 L2 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 136 kW 6.3 l/100km
12. Transit Custom {VAN} Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW 6.4 l/100km
13. Transit Custom Kombi Nugget Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW 6.8 l/100km
14. Ranger Extrakabine 2.0 TDCi Stormtrak 4x4 {automatic} 156 kW 6.9 l/100km
15. Mustang Convertible Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost {automatic} 213 kW 9.1 l/100km
16. Mustang Fastback Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost {automatic} 213 kW 12.4 l/100km

How does the combined consumption (nedc) of the Ford Ranger compare to it's nearest competitors?

Ford Ranger vs. similar cars

(Combined consumption (NEDC))
Combined consumption (NEDC): Ford Ranger vs. similar cars
Car modelCombined consumption (NEDC)
Nissan Qashqai 1.3 DIG-T MHEV 20215.8 l/100km
Toyota RAV4 2.0 20196.0 l/100km
Honda CR-V 1.5 Turbo 20186.3 l/100km
Ford Mustang Fastback 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 201812.4 l/100km
1. Nissan Qashqai 1.3 DIG-T MHEV 2021 5.8 l/100km
2. Toyota RAV4 2.0 2019 6.0 l/100km
3. Honda CR-V 1.5 Turbo 2018 6.3 l/100km
4. Ford Mustang Fastback 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 2018 12.4 l/100km

Similar cars

VW Nutzfahrzeuge Amarok
Combined consumption (NEDC):
NAN% (0.0 l/100km)


Compare
Isuzu D-Max
Combined consumption (NEDC):
NAN% (0.0 l/100km)


Compare
SsangYong Musso
Combined consumption (NEDC):
NAN% (0.0 l/100km)


Compare
Toyota Hilux
Combined consumption (NEDC):
NAN% (0.0 l/100km)


Compare
Ford Mustang
Combined consumption (NEDC):
+INF% (12.4 l/100km)


Compare
Subaru BRZ
Combined consumption (NEDC):
NAN% (0.0 l/100km)


Compare
Nissan Qashqai
Combined consumption (NEDC):
+INF% (5.8 l/100km)


Compare
Toyota GT86/GR86
Combined consumption (NEDC):
NAN% (0.0 l/100km)


Compare
Peugeot 5008
Combined consumption (NEDC):
NAN% (0.0 l/100km)


Compare
Citroen C5 Aircross
Combined consumption (NEDC):
NAN% (0.0 l/100km)


Compare

Compare with ...

TOPlist