Comparison:Nissan NP300 2008 Vs. Ford Ranger 2022 (new)

#	Nissan NP300	Ford Ranger	Add to comparison New comparison

Generation	NP300 D22A/N (2. Facelift) (D22) 2008 - 2015 Change selected generation	Ranger 4. Generation (2AB) 2022 - Now Change selected generation
Body	Pickup Truck	Pickup Truck
Doors	2	2
Vehicle class	Upper mid-size car (e.g., E-Class)	Upper mid-size car (e.g., E-Class)
Engine	Select engine for the exact values to be shown	Select engine for the exact values to be shown
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Dimensions

Length

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 5370 mm

2. Nissan NP300 2008 5020 mm

Wheelbase

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 3270 mm

2. Nissan NP300 2008 2950 mm

Width

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 1918 mm

2. Nissan NP300 2008 1825 mm

Width including mirrors

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 2208 mm

2. Nissan NP300 2008 ?

Height

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 1868 mm

2. Nissan NP300 2008 1700 mm

Ground clearance

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 235 - 266 mm

2. Nissan NP300 2008 230 mm

Turning circle

1. Nissan NP300 2008 12.80 m

2. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 12.90 - 13.00 m

Boot/interior

Seats

1. Nissan NP300 2008 3

2. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 2

Doors

1. Nissan NP300 2008 2

2. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 2

Engines/drivetrain

Drive

1. Nissan NP300 2008 All-wheel drive

2. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) All-wheel drive

Fuel

1. Nissan NP300 2008 Diesel

2. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) Premium, Diesel

Gearbox

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) Automatic Transmission, Manual Transmission

2. Nissan NP300 2008 Manual Transmission

Gears

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 6 - 10

2. Nissan NP300 2008 5

Cylinders

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 4 - 6

2. Nissan NP300 2008 4

Max. speed

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 180 - 190 km/h

2. Nissan NP300 2008 160 km/h

Power

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 125 - 215 kW

2. Nissan NP300 2008 98 kW

Torque

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 405 - 600 Nm

2. Nissan NP300 2008 304 Nm

Cubic capacity

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 2000 - 3000 ccm

2. Nissan NP300 2008 2488 ccm

Acceleration 0-100km/h

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 7.9 - 12.1 s

2. Nissan NP300 2008 ?

Consumption/ecology

Tank size

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 80 l

2. Nissan NP300 2008 75 l

Combined consumption (NEDC)

1. Nissan NP300 2008 9.1 - 9.2 l/100km

2. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) ?

City consumption (NEDC)

1. Nissan NP300 2008 10.4 l/100km

2. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) ?

Combined consumption (WLTP)

1. Nissan NP300 2008 ?

2. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 8.4 l/100km

CO2 emissions (WLTP)

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 220.0 - 315.0 g/km

2. Nissan NP300 2008 ?

Emission standard

1. Nissan NP300 2008 Euro 4 III, Euro 5

2. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) Truck

Tyre size

1. Nissan NP300 2008 205R16C

2. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 255/70R16

Noise

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 71 - 72 dB

2. Nissan NP300 2008 ?

Weight/towing

Empty weight (EU)

1. Nissan NP300 2008 1825 - 1875 kg

2. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 2082 - 2486 kg

Permissible total weight

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 3130 - 3350 kg

2. Nissan NP300 2008 2860 kg

Braked trailer

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 2500 - 3500 kg

2. Nissan NP300 2008 2800 - 2860 kg

Trailer (no brakes)

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 750 kg

2. Nissan NP300 2008 750 kg

Max. roof load

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 80 kg

2. Nissan NP300 2008 50 kg

Max. towbar load

1. Nissan NP300 2008 112 - 120 kg

2. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) ?

Offroad

Ramp angle

1. Nissan NP300 2008 25.00 °

2. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 21.00 - 24.00 °

Departure angle

1. Nissan NP300 2008 30.00 °

2. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 25.60 - 28.90 °

Approach angle

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 30.00 - 32.00 °

2. Nissan NP300 2008 31.00 °

Fording

1. Ford Ranger 2022 (new) 800.00 - 850.00 mm

2. Nissan NP300 2008 450.00 mm

Comparison:Nissan NP300 2008 Vs. Ford Ranger 2022 (new)

Add to comparison

Dimensions

Boot/interior

Engines/drivetrain

Consumption/ecology

Weight/towing

Offroad