Nissan Pixo engines
(Acceleration 0-100km/h)Engine | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
---|---|
1.0 Visia 50 kW | 14.0 s |
1.0 Acenta Automatik 50 kW | 17.0 s |
1. 1.0 Visia 50 kW
14.0 s
The acceleration 0-100km/h compared to other Nissan models
Nissan Pixo vs other current cars by Nissan
(Acceleration 0-100km/h)Variant name | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
---|---|
GT-R Premium Edition 404 kW | 3.6 s |
370Z Nismo Coupé Roadster Pack {automatic} 241 kW | 5.2 s |
370Z Coupé Roadster Pack {automatic} 241 kW | 5.3 s |
370Z Roadster Roadster Pack {automatic} 241 kW | 5.5 s |
350Z Coupé Roadster Premium Pack 221 kW | 5.8 s |
350Z Roadster Roadster Premium Pack 221 kW | 6.3 s |
Juke Nismo Nismo RS 160 kW | 7.0 s |
Murano 3.5 V6 4x4 XTronic 188 kW | 8.0 s |
X-Trail 2.0 dCi Acenta 4x4i 130 kW | 10.5 s |
Pulsar 1.6 DIG-T N-TEC 140 kW | 10.7 s |
Navara King Cab 2.5 dCi Business 128 kW | 10.8 s |
Qashqai 1.6 DIG-T Acenta 120 kW | 10.9 s |
Tiida {sedan} 1.8 Acenta 93 kW | 11.1 s |
Tiida 1.8 Acenta 93 kW | 11.1 s |
Cube 1.6 Iki 81 kW | 11.3 s |
Leaf Visia 80 kW | 11.5 s |
Pathfinder 4.0 V6 Premium {automatic} 198 kW | 11.5 s |
Juke Nismo RS 160 kW | 12.0 s |
Micra C+C C+C 1.6 Premium 81 kW | 12.8 s |
Note 1.6 Acenta 81 kW | 13.4 s |
Pixo 1.0 More 50 kW | 14.0 s |
e-NV200 Kombi Kombi 1.5 dCi 85 Premium 63 kW | 14.0 s |
e-NV200 {VAN} Kombi 1.5 dCi 85 Premium 63 kW | 14.0 s |
e-NV200 Evalia Kombi 1.5 dCi 85 Premium 63 kW | 14.0 s |
Patrol 3.0 Di XE 118 kW | 14.8 s |
Terrano II II 2.7 TD Elegance 92 kW | 15.7 s |
Micra C+C 1.6 Premium 81 kW | 16.3 s |
14. Tiida 1.8 Acenta 93 kW
11.1 s
15. Cube 1.6 Iki 81 kW
11.3 s
16. Leaf Visia 80 kW
11.5 s
18. Juke Nismo RS 160 kW
12.0 s
20. Note 1.6 Acenta 81 kW
13.4 s
21. Pixo 1.0 More 50 kW
14.0 s
25. Patrol 3.0 Di XE 118 kW
14.8 s
How does the acceleration 0-100km/h of the Nissan Pixo compare to it's nearest competitors?
Nissan Pixo vs. similar cars
(Acceleration 0-100km/h)Car model | Acceleration 0-100km/h |
---|---|
Ford Fiesta ST 1.5 EcoBoost 2022 | 6.5 s |
Abarth 595 2016 | 7.8 s |
Toyota Yaris 1.5 2020 | 9.0 s |
Toyota Corolla 1.2T 2019 | 9.3 s |
Honda Jazz 1.5 i-MMD e:HEV 2020 | 9.4 s |
Hyundai i20 1.0 T-GDI 2020 | 10.4 s |
VW Polo 1.0 TSI OPF 2021 | 11.3 s |
Mazda 2 SKYACTIV-G 75 M Hybrid 2020 | 11.4 s |
KIA Ceed 1.0 T-GDI 2021 | 11.8 s |
Suzuki Swift 1.2 Dualjet 2017 | 11.9 s |
Hyundai i30 1.5 2020 | 12.3 s |
Fiat 500 1.2 8V 2015 | 12.9 s |
KIA Rio 1.2 2020 | 13.1 s |
Peugeot 208 1.2 PureTech 75 2019 | 13.2 s |
Fiat Panda 1.0 GSE Hybrid 2020 | 13.9 s |
Nissan Pixo 1.0 2009 | 14.0 s |
Toyota Aygo 1.0 2018 | 14.2 s |
VW up! 1.0 2016 | 14.4 s |
KIA Picanto 1.0 2020 | 14.6 s |
Skoda Fabia 1.0 MPI 2018 | 14.9 s |
Nissan Micra 1.0 2017 | 15.1 s |
Renault Twingo SCe 65 2019 | 15.1 s |
Citroen C3 PureTech 83 Stop&Start 2020 | 15.2 s |
SEAT Ibiza 1.0 MPI 2021 | 15.3 s |
Mitsubishi Space Star 1.0 2020 | 15.7 s |
Hyundai i10 1.0 2020 | 16.6 s |
Dacia Sandero SCe 65 2020 | 16.7 s |
Renault Clio SCe 65 2019 | 17.1 s |
2. Abarth 595 2016
7.8 s
3. Toyota Yaris 1.5 2020
9.0 s
7. VW Polo 1.0 TSI OPF 2021
11.3 s
9. KIA Ceed 1.0 T-GDI 2021
11.8 s
11. Hyundai i30 1.5 2020
12.3 s
12. Fiat 500 1.2 8V 2015
12.9 s
13. KIA Rio 1.2 2020
13.1 s
16. Nissan Pixo 1.0 2009
14.0 s
17. Toyota Aygo 1.0 2018
14.2 s
18. VW up! 1.0 2016
14.4 s
19. KIA Picanto 1.0 2020
14.6 s
20. Skoda Fabia 1.0 MPI 2018
14.9 s
21. Nissan Micra 1.0 2017
15.1 s
24. SEAT Ibiza 1.0 MPI 2021
15.3 s
26. Hyundai i10 1.0 2020
16.6 s
28. Renault Clio SCe 65 2019
17.1 s