Comparison: combined consumption (NEDC) Mitsubishi Lancer Evo (10.Generation 2008 - 2014) vs. competitors

8.Generation 2004
9.Generation 2005
10.Generation 2008
Table of contents:

Mitsubishi Lancer Evo - What is the combined consumption (nedc) of different engines?

Mitsubishi Lancer Evo engines
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo engines
EngineCombined consumption (NEDC)
lution X 217 kW10 l/100km
lution X SST 217 kW10 l/100km
  • lution X 217 kW 10 l/100km
  • lution X SST 217 kW 10 l/100km

The combined consumption (nedc) compared to other Mitsubishi models

Mitsubishi Lancer Evo vs other current cars by Mitsubishi
Combined consumption (NEDC): Lancer Evo vs. other models by Mitsubishi
Variant nameCombined consumption (NEDC)
Space Star 1.2 ClearTec Shine 59 kW4 l/100km
Colt 1.5 Turbo Ralliart 110 kW5 l/100km
ASX 1.8 DI-D+ Invite 2WD 110 kW5 l/100km
Lancer Sportlimousine 1.8 Instyle CVT-{automatic} 103 kW6 l/100km
Grandis 2.4 Motion 121 kW6 l/100km
Lancer 2.0 Intense 99 kW6 l/100km
Lancer Sportback 1.8 Instyle CVT-{automatic} 103 kW7 l/100km
Lancer Kombi 2.0 Intense 99 kW7 l/100km
L200 2.5 DI-D+ Club Cab Plus 4WD 131 kW8 l/100km
Pajero 3.8 V6 Instyle {automatic} 184 kW9 l/100km
Outlander 2.0 Turbo 4WD 148 kW9 l/100km
Pajero Classic 3.2 DI-D 118 kW9 l/100km
Lancer Evo X lution X TC-SST MR 217 kW10 l/100km
Lancer Evo IX lution IX 206 kW10 l/100km
Lancer Evo VIII lution VIII 195 kW10 l/100km
Electric Vehicle Electric Vehicle 49 kW12 l/100km
i-MiEV Electric Vehicle 49 kW13 l/100km
  • Space Star 1.2 ClearTec Shine 59 kW 4 l/100km
  • Colt 1.5 Turbo Ralliart 110 kW 5 l/100km
  • ASX 1.8 DI-D+ Invite 2WD 110 kW 5 l/100km
  • Lancer Sportlimousine 1.8 Instyle CVT-{automatic} 103 kW 6 l/100km
  • Grandis 2.4 Motion 121 kW 6 l/100km
  • Lancer 2.0 Intense 99 kW 6 l/100km
  • Lancer Sportback 1.8 Instyle CVT-{automatic} 103 kW 7 l/100km
  • Lancer Kombi 2.0 Intense 99 kW 7 l/100km
  • L200 2.5 DI-D+ Club Cab Plus 4WD 131 kW 8 l/100km
  • Pajero 3.8 V6 Instyle {automatic} 184 kW 9 l/100km
  • Outlander 2.0 Turbo 4WD 148 kW 9 l/100km
  • Pajero Classic 3.2 DI-D 118 kW 9 l/100km
  • Lancer Evo X lution X TC-SST MR 217 kW 10 l/100km
  • Lancer Evo IX lution IX 206 kW 10 l/100km
  • Lancer Evo VIII lution VIII 195 kW 10 l/100km
  • Electric Vehicle Electric Vehicle 49 kW 12 l/100km
  • i-MiEV Electric Vehicle 49 kW 13 l/100km

How does the combined consumption (nedc) of the Mitsubishi Lancer Evo compare to it's nearest competitors?

Mitsubishi Lancer Evo vs. similar cars
Combined consumption (NEDC): Mitsubishi Lancer Evo vs. similar cars
Car modelCombined consumption (NEDC)
Toyota RAV4 2.0 20196 l/100km
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 200810 l/100km
  • toyotaToyota RAV4 2.0 2019 6 l/100km
  • mitsubishiMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2008 10 l/100km

Similar cars

Hyundai Tucson
Hyundai Tucson
hyundai Logo 2024 • NX4E
Body type
SUV
Length
4510 mm
Width
1865 mm
Height
1650 mm
Wheelbase
2680 mm
Boot capacity
620 l
Weight
1520 kg
Doors
5
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
KGM Torres
KGM Torres
2025 • UK
Body type
SUV
Length
4700 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1710 mm
Wheelbase
2680 mm
Boot capacity
703 l
Weight
1498 kg
Doors
5
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
VW T-Roc
VW T-Roc
vw Logo 2022 • A1
Body type
SUV
Length
4236 mm
Width
1819 mm
Height
1584 mm
Wheelbase
2590 mm
Boot capacity
445 l
Weight
1301 kg
Doors
5
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Ford Focus
Ford Focus
ford Logo 2022 • DEH
Body type
Hatchback
Length
4397 mm
Width
1844 mm
Height
1482 mm
Wheelbase
2700 mm
Boot capacity
392 l
Weight
1330 kg
Doors
5
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Ford Kuga
Ford Kuga
ford Logo 2019 • DFK
Body type
SUV
Length
4614 mm
Width
1883 mm
Height
1661 mm
Wheelbase
2710 mm
Boot capacity
435 l
Weight
1564 kg
Doors
5
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Ford Mustang
Ford Mustang
ford Logo 2024 • LAE
Body type
Coupe
Length
4810 mm
Width
1916 mm
Height
1414 mm
Wheelbase
2719 mm
Boot capacity
381 l
Weight
1808 kg
Doors
2
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Skoda Octavia
Skoda Octavia
skoda Logo 2024 • NX
Body type
Sedan
Length
4698 mm
Width
1829 mm
Height
1470 mm
Wheelbase
2686 mm
Boot capacity
600 l
Weight
1351 kg
Doors
5
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki S-Cross
suzuki Logo 2022 • JY
Body type
SUV
Length
4300 mm
Width
1785 mm
Height
1580 mm
Wheelbase
2600 mm
Boot capacity
430 l
Weight
1280 kg
Doors
5
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Toyota RAV4
Toyota RAV4
toyota Logo 2019 • XA5
Body type
SUV
Length
4600 mm
Width
1855 mm
Height
1685 mm
Wheelbase
2690 mm
Boot capacity
580 l
Weight
1615 kg
Doors
5
Combined consumption (NEDC)
6 l/100km (-40%)
Compare
VW Golf
VW Golf
vw Logo 2024 • CD
Body type
Hatchback
Length
4282 mm
Width
1789 mm
Height
1483 mm
Wheelbase
2620 mm
Boot capacity
381 l
Weight
1307 kg
Doors
5
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
ford Logo 2024 • J2K
Body type
SUV
Length
4186 mm
Width
1805 mm
Height
1550 mm
Wheelbase
2588 mm
Boot capacity
456 l
Weight
1316 kg
Doors
5
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Dacia Bigster
Dacia Bigster
dacia Logo 2025 • DJF
Body type
SUV
Length
4570 mm
Width
1813 mm
Height
1705 mm
Wheelbase
2704 mm
Boot capacity
550 l
Weight
1503 kg
Doors
5
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Hyundai i30
Hyundai i30
hyundai Logo 2024 • PDE
Body type
Hatchback
Length
4340 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1455 mm
Wheelbase
2650 mm
Boot capacity
395 l
Weight
1291 kg
Doors
5
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare

Compare with ...

Find the Perfect Match
Compare your car with other models
TOPlist