Comparison: combined consumption (NEDC) Mazda BT-50 (1.Generation (1. Facelift) 2008 - 2012) vs. competitors

1.Generation 2007
1.Generation (1. Facelift) 2008
Table of contents:

Mazda BT-50 - What is the combined consumption (nedc) of different engines?

Mazda BT-50 engines
Mazda BT-50 engines
EngineCombined consumption (NEDC)
L-Cab Midlands 105 kW8 l/100km
  • L-Cab Midlands 105 kW 8 l/100km

The combined consumption (nedc) compared to other Mazda models

Mazda BT-50 vs other current cars by Mazda
Combined consumption (NEDC): BT-50 vs. other models by Mazda
Variant nameCombined consumption (NEDC)
2 1.5 Impression 76 kW5 l/100km
6 Sport 2.2 CD Exclusive 136 kW6 l/100km
6 {sedan} Sport 2.2 CD Exclusive 136 kW6 l/100km
3 MPS 191 kW6 l/100km
3 {sedan} MPS 191 kW6 l/100km
CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175 Sports-Line AWD Automatik 129 kW6 l/100km
6 Kombi Sport 2.2 CD Exclusive 136 kW7 l/100km
5 2.0 Exclusive 107 kW7 l/100km
MX-5 2.0 Emotion 118 kW7 l/100km
MX-5 Roadster-Coupe 2.0 Emotion 118 kW7 l/100km
BT-50 L-Cab Midlands 105 kW8 l/100km
3 MPS MPS 191 kW9 l/100km
CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo High-Line 191 kW10 l/100km
Tribute 3.0 Exclusive AWD {automatic} 149 kW10 l/100km
MPV 2.3 Comfort 104 kW10 l/100km
RX-8 High-Power Challenge 170 kW11 l/100km
  • 2 1.5 Impression 76 kW 5 l/100km
  • 6 Sport 2.2 CD Exclusive 136 kW 6 l/100km
  • 6 {sedan} Sport 2.2 CD Exclusive 136 kW 6 l/100km
  • 3 MPS 191 kW 6 l/100km
  • 3 {sedan} MPS 191 kW 6 l/100km
  • CX-5 2.2 SKYACTIV-D 175 Sports-Line AWD Automatik 129 kW 6 l/100km
  • 6 Kombi Sport 2.2 CD Exclusive 136 kW 7 l/100km
  • 5 2.0 Exclusive 107 kW 7 l/100km
  • MX-5 2.0 Emotion 118 kW 7 l/100km
  • MX-5 Roadster-Coupe 2.0 Emotion 118 kW 7 l/100km
  • BT-50 L-Cab Midlands 105 kW 8 l/100km
  • 3 MPS MPS 191 kW 9 l/100km
  • CX-7 2.3 DISI Turbo High-Line 191 kW 10 l/100km
  • Tribute 3.0 Exclusive AWD {automatic} 149 kW 10 l/100km
  • MPV 2.3 Comfort 104 kW 10 l/100km
  • RX-8 High-Power Challenge 170 kW 11 l/100km

How does the combined consumption (nedc) of the Mazda BT-50 compare to it's nearest competitors?

Mazda BT-50 vs. similar cars
Combined consumption (NEDC): Mazda BT-50 vs. similar cars
Car modelCombined consumption (NEDC)
Casalini 550 20223 l/100km
Aixam Ambition City 20233 l/100km
Aixam Minauto 20233 l/100km
Fiat Tipo Kombi 1.3 Multijet 20204 l/100km
Fiat Ducato Kombi 30 kurz 115 Multijet 20146 l/100km
Mazda BT-50 L-Cab 20088 l/100km
  • Casalini 550 2022 3 l/100km
  • aixamAixam Ambition City 2023 3 l/100km
  • aixamAixam Minauto 2023 3 l/100km
  • fiatFiat Tipo Kombi 1.3 Multijet 2020 4 l/100km
  • fiatFiat Ducato Kombi 30 kurz 115 Multijet 2014 6 l/100km
  • mazdaMazda BT-50 L-Cab 2008 8 l/100km

Similar cars

Toyota Hilux
Toyota Hilux
toyota Logo 2020 • AN1P
Body type
Pickup Truck
Length
5325 mm
Width
1800 mm
Height
1795 mm
Wheelbase
3085 mm
Weight
1960 kg
Doors
2
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
KGM Musso
KGM Musso
2025 • QK
Body type
Pickup Truck
Length
5095 mm
Width
1950 mm
Height
1840 mm
Wheelbase
3100 mm
Weight
2145 kg
Doors
4
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
VW Nutzfahrzeuge Amarok
VW Nutzfahrzeuge Amarok
2023 • T1
Body type
Pickup Truck
Length
5350 mm
Width
1910 mm
Height
1871 mm
Wheelbase
3270 mm
Weight
2262 kg
Doors
4
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Isuzu D-Max
Isuzu D-Max
isuzu Logo 2024 • BTF
Body type
Pickup Truck
Length
5280 mm
Width
1870 mm
Height
1790 mm
Wheelbase
3125 mm
Weight
2055 kg
Doors
2
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Maxus T60 MAX
Maxus T60 MAX
2025 • SK8C
Body type
Pickup Truck
Length
5395 mm
Width
1960 mm
Height
1870 mm
Wheelbase
3155 mm
Weight
2275 kg
Doors
4
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Maxus T90 EV
Maxus T90 EV
2023 • SK8C
Body type
Pickup Truck
Length
5365 mm
Width
1900 mm
Height
1809 mm
Wheelbase
3155 mm
Weight
2375 kg
Doors
4
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Ford Ranger
Ford Ranger
ford Logo 2022 • 2AB
Body type
Pickup Truck
Length
5381 mm
Width
1968 mm
Height
1922 mm
Wheelbase
3270 mm
Weight
2454 kg
Doors
4
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Fiat Ducato
Fiat Ducato
fiat Logo 2014 • ZAF 250
Body type
Bus
Length
4963 mm
Width
2050 mm
Height
2254 mm
Wheelbase
3000 mm
Weight
2010 kg
Doors
4
Combined consumption (NEDC)
6 l/100km (-25%)
Compare
VW Nutzfahrzeuge Caddy
VW Nutzfahrzeuge Caddy
2020 • SB
Body type
Small Commercial Van
Length
4500 mm
Width
1855 mm
Height
1819 mm
Wheelbase
2755 mm
Weight
1543 kg
Doors
4
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Fiat Tipo
Fiat Tipo
fiat Logo 2020 • 356
Body type
Station Wagon
Length
4571 mm
Width
1792 mm
Height
1514 mm
Wheelbase
2638 mm
Boot capacity
550 l
Weight
1385 kg
Doors
5
Combined consumption (NEDC)
4 l/100km (-50%)
Compare
Ford Transit Connect
Ford Transit Connect
ford Logo 2024 • SK
Body type
Small Commercial Van
Length
4500 mm
Width
1855 mm
Height
1856 mm
Wheelbase
2755 mm
Doors
4
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Renault Master
Renault Master
renault Logo 2020 • M*
Body type
Van
Length
5075 mm
Width
2070 mm
Height
2307 mm
Wheelbase
3182 mm
Weight
1978 kg
Doors
4
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Toyota Proace
Toyota Proace
toyota Logo 2024 • V
Body type
Bus
Length
4983 mm
Width
1920 mm
Height
1890 mm
Wheelbase
3275 mm
Weight
1835 kg
Doors
4
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare
Fiat Scudo
Fiat Scudo
fiat Logo 2024 • Typ 507
Body type
Van
Length
4980 mm
Width
1920 mm
Height
1895 mm
Wheelbase
3275 mm
Weight
1791 kg
Doors
4
Combined consumption (NEDC)
0 l/100km (-100%)
Compare

Compare with ...

Find the Perfect Match
Compare your car with other models
TOPlist