Comparison:Ford EcoSport 2017 Vs. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982

#	Ford EcoSport	Mitsubishi Tredia	Add to comparison New comparison

Generation	1.Generation (1. Facelift) (JK8) 2017 - 2022 Change selected generation	1G (A210) 1982 - 1986 Change selected generation
Body	SUV	Sedan
Doors	5	4
Vehicle class	Subcompact car (e.g., Polo)	Mid-size car (e.g., 3 Series)
Engine	Select engine for the exact values to be shown	Select engine for the exact values to be shown
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Dimensions

Length

1. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 4280 mm

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 4096 mm

Wheelbase

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 2519 mm

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 2445 mm

Width

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 1765 mm

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 1660 mm

Width including mirrors

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 2057 mm

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 ?

Height

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 1653 mm

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 1370 mm

Ground clearance

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 160 - 162 mm

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 150 mm

Turning circle

1. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 9.80 m

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 10.60 - 11.20 m

Boot/interior

Boot space

1. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 460 l

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 321 l

Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to roof)

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 1145 l

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 ?

Seats

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 5

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 5

Doors

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 5

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 4

Isofix

1. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 ?

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 Serie

Engines/drivetrain

Drive

1. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 Front-wheel drive

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 Front-wheel drive, All-wheel drive

Fuel

1. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 Premium

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 Premium, Diesel

Gearbox

1. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 Manual Transmission

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 Manual Transmission, Automatic Transmission

Gears

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 6

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 4 - 5

Cylinders

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 3 - 4

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 4

Max. speed

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 160 - 190 km/h

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 160 - 183 km/h

Power

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 70 - 103 kW

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 55 - 84 kW

Torque

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 170 - 300 Nm

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 116 - 170 Nm

Cubic capacity

1. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 1597 - 1755 ccm

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 998 - 1499 ccm

Acceleration 0-100km/h

1. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 13.0 s

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 10.2 - 14.0 s

Consumption/ecology

Tank size

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 52 l

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 50 l

Combined consumption (NEDC)

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 4.1 - 6.2 l/100km

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 ?

City consumption (NEDC)

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 4.5 - 7.6 l/100km

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 ?

Combined consumption (WLTP)

1. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 ?

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 5.9 l/100km

CO2 emissions (WLTP)

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 132.0 - 166.0 g/km

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 ?

Emission standard

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 Euro 6b (NEDC), Euro 6d-TEMP (WLTP) 36AG-AI, Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP-ISC (WLTP) 36CH, 36CI, 36DG, Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 Without Catalytic Converter

Tyre size

1. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 165R13S

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 205/60R16

Noise

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 66 - 70 dB

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 ?

Weight/towing

Empty weight (EU)

1. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 930 - 1020 kg

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 1343 - 1520 kg

Permissible total weight

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 1725 - 1895 kg

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 1440 - 1530 kg

Braked trailer

1. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 1100 kg

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 750 - 1100 kg

Trailer (no brakes)

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 675 - 750 kg

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 450 kg

Max. roof load

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 40 kg

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 ?

Max. towbar load

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 30 - 75 kg

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 ?

Offroad

Ramp angle

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 23.30 °

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 ?

Departure angle

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 33.30 °

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 ?

Approach angle

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 21.00 °

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 ?

Fording

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 550.00 mm

2. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982 ?

Comparison:Ford EcoSport 2017 Vs. Mitsubishi Tredia 1982

Add to comparison

Dimensions

Boot/interior

Engines/drivetrain

Consumption/ecology

Weight/towing

Offroad