Comparator
|
Contact Us
|
CARSPECSLAB.COM
CARSPECSLAB.COM
Width
Profile
Rim size
Type
Winter
Summer
Allround
Find me the best tyres
CarSpecsLab.com
Nissan
Note
Nissan Note (2013 - 2016)
Table of contents:
Specs
Engines
Generations
Similar cars
Compare
Model specs
Model info
Model name
Nissan Note
Generation
E12
Production years
2013 - 2016
Doors
5
5
Dimensions
Length
4100
mm
Maxus Euniq 5
4825 mm
4,825.0
Dacia Jogger
4547 mm
4,547.0
VW Touran
4527 mm
4,527.0
KIA Stonic
4140 mm
Nissan Note (This)
4100 mm
4,100.0
Avg
4,825.0
Higher is better
Wheelbase
2600
mm
Dacia Jogger
2897 mm
2,897.0
Maxus Euniq 5
2800 mm
2,800.0
VW Touran
2786 mm
2,786.0
Nissan Note (This)
2600 mm
KIA Stonic
2580 mm
2,564.0
Avg
2,897.0
Higher is better
Width
1695
mm
VW Touran
1829 mm
1,829.0
Maxus Euniq 5
1825 mm
1,825.0
Dacia Jogger
1784 mm
1,784.0
KIA Stonic
1760 mm
1,760.0
Nissan Note (This)
1695 mm
1,695.0
Avg
1,829.0
Higher is better
Height
1535
mm
Maxus Euniq 5
1800 mm
1,800.0
Dacia Jogger
1674 mm
1,674.0
VW Touran
1668 mm
1,668.0
Nissan Note (This)
1535 mm
1,535.0
KIA Stonic
1505 mm
1,459.0
Avg
1,800.0
Higher is better
Ground clearance
131
mm
Dacia Jogger
200 mm
200.0
KIA Stonic
165 mm
165.0
VW Touran
156 mm
156.0
Skoda Fabia
138 mm
Nissan Note (This)
131 mm
131.0
Avg
200.0
Higher is better
Turning circle
10
m
Nissan Note (This)
10 m
10.0
KIA Stonic
10 m
10.0
Skoda Fabia
10 m
10.0
VW Touran
11 m
Dacia Jogger
11 m
10.0
Avg
11.0
Lower is better
Boot/interior
Boot space
325
l
VW Touran
834 l
834.0
Skoda Fabia
380 l
380.0
KIA Stonic
352 l
352.0
Nissan Note (This)
325 l
325.0
Dacia Jogger
160 l
160.0
Avg
834.0
Higher is better
Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to roof)
1495
l
VW Touran
1980 l
1,980.0
Dacia Jogger
1807 l
1,807.0
Nissan Note (This)
1495 l
1,495.0
Skoda Fabia
1190 l
KIA Stonic
1155 l
1,155.0
Avg
1,980.0
Higher is better
Seats
5
5
Doors
5
5
Engines/drivetrain
Cylinders
3 - 4
VW Touran
4
4.0
KIA Stonic
4
4.0
Nissan Note (This)
3 - 4
Dacia Jogger
3
Skoda Fabia
3
3.0
Avg
4.0
Higher is better
Max. speed
170 - 181
km/h
VW Touran
189 km/h
189.0
Dacia Jogger
174 km/h
174.0
Nissan Note (This)
170 - 181
km/h
170.0
KIA Stonic
165 km/h
165.0
Maxus Euniq 5
160 km/h
160.0
Avg
189.0
Higher is better
Torque
110 - 200
Nm
Maxus Euniq 5
310 Nm
310.0
Dacia Jogger
200 Nm
200.0
VW Touran
175 Nm
175.0
KIA Stonic
122 Nm
Nissan Note (This)
110 - 200
Nm
93.0
Avg
310.0
Higher is better
Power
59 - 72
kW
Maxus Euniq 5
130 kW
130.0
VW Touran
81 kW
81.0
Dacia Jogger
81 kW
81.0
KIA Stonic
62 kW
62.0
Nissan Note (This)
59 - 72
kW
48.0
Avg
130.0
Higher is better
Cubic capacity
1198 - 1461
ccm
KIA Stonic
1248 ccm
1,248.0
Nissan Note (This)
1198 - 1461
ccm
1,198.0
VW Touran
1197 ccm
1,197.0
Dacia Jogger
999 ccm
Skoda Fabia
999 ccm
999.0
Avg
1,248.0
Higher is better
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11 - 13
s
Skoda Fabia
15 s
15.0
KIA Stonic
13 s
13.0
Nissan Note (This)
11 - 13
s
VW Touran
11 s
Dacia Jogger
11 s
11.0
Avg
15.0
Higher is better
Consumption/ecology
Tank size
41
l
VW Touran
58 l
58.0
Dacia Jogger
50 l
50.0
KIA Stonic
45 l
45.0
Nissan Note (This)
41
l
Skoda Fabia
40 l
40.0
Avg
58.0
Higher is better
Combined consumption (NEDC)
3 - 5
l/100km
VW Touran
5 l/100km
5.0
KIA Stonic
5 l/100km
5.0
Nissan Note (This)
3 - 5
l/100km
3.0
Avg
5.0
Higher is better
City consumption (NEDC)
4 - 6
l/100km
VW Touran
6 l/100km
6.0
KIA Stonic
6 l/100km
6.0
Nissan Note (This)
4 - 6
l/100km
4.0
Avg
6.0
Higher is better
Empty weight (EU)
1080 - 1165
kg
Maxus Euniq 5
1810 kg
1,810.0
VW Touran
1436 kg
1,436.0
Dacia Jogger
1280 kg
1,280.0
KIA Stonic
1145 kg
Nissan Note (This)
1080 - 1165
kg
1,080.0
Avg
1,810.0
Higher is better
Towing
Max. towbar load
45
kg
VW Touran
80 kg
80.0
Dacia Jogger
75 kg
75.0
KIA Stonic
75 kg
75.0
Skoda Fabia
50 kg
Nissan Note (This)
45
kg
45.0
Avg
80.0
Higher is better
Max. roof load
50
kg
Dacia Jogger
80 kg
80.0
VW Touran
75 kg
75.0
Skoda Fabia
75 kg
75.0
KIA Stonic
70 kg
70.0
Nissan Note (This)
50
kg
50.0
Avg
80.0
Higher is better
Braked trailer
450
kg
VW Touran
1300 kg
1,300.0
Dacia Jogger
1200 kg
1,200.0
KIA Stonic
910 kg
910.0
Nissan Note (This)
450
kg
Maxus Euniq 5
400 kg
400.0
Avg
1,300.0
Higher is better
Trailer (no brakes)
450
kg
VW Touran
710 kg
710.0
Dacia Jogger
640 kg
640.0
Nissan Note (This)
450
kg
450.0
KIA Stonic
450 kg
450.0
Maxus Euniq 5
400 kg
400.0
Avg
710.0
Higher is better
Engines (Note)
Filter by fuel:
All
Premium
Diesel
Gasoline
MAN
FWD
1.2 Visia
Engine & Power
Power
59 kW / 80 HP
Capacity
1.2L (1,198 ccm)
Cylinders
3
Performance
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13 s
Max. speed
170 km/h
Torque & RPM
Torque
110 Nm
Consumption
Combined consumption (NEDC)
4 l/100km
Maximum torque at RPM
4000 RPM
City consumption (NEDC)
5 l/100km
Technical Details
Maximum output at RPM
6000 RPM
Fuel injection
Injection
Diesel
MAN
FWD
1.5 dCi Visia
Engine & Power
Power
66 kW / 90 HP
Capacity
1.5L (1,461 ccm)
Cylinders
4
Performance
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11 s
Max. speed
179 km/h
Torque & RPM
Torque
200 Nm
Consumption
Combined consumption (NEDC)
3 l/100km
Maximum torque at RPM
2000 RPM
City consumption (NEDC)
4 l/100km
Technical Details
Maximum output at RPM
4000 RPM
Fuel injection
Common Rail
Gasoline
MAN
FWD
1.2 DIG-S Acenta
Engine & Power
Power
72 kW / 98 HP
Capacity
1.2L (1,198 ccm)
Cylinders
3
Performance
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11 s
Max. speed
181 km/h
Torque & RPM
Torque
147 Nm
Consumption
Combined consumption (NEDC)
4 l/100km
Maximum torque at RPM
4400 RPM
City consumption (NEDC)
5 l/100km
Technical Details
Maximum output at RPM
5600 RPM
Fuel injection
Direct Injection
Gasoline
AUT
FWD
1.2 DIG-S Acenta XTronic
Engine & Power
Power
72 kW / 98 HP
Capacity
1.2L (1,198 ccm)
Cylinders
3
Performance
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12 s
Max. speed
173 km/h
Torque & RPM
Torque
147 Nm
Consumption
Combined consumption (NEDC)
5 l/100km
Maximum torque at RPM
4400 RPM
City consumption (NEDC)
6 l/100km
Technical Details
Maximum output at RPM
5600 RPM
Fuel injection
Direct Injection
Compare all engines
Nissan Note generations
Note E11
2006 - 2009
Length
4083 mm
Height
1550 mm
Wheelbase
2600 mm
Length
4083 mm
Note E11 (1. Facelift)
2009 - 2013
Length
4100 mm
Height
1550 mm
Wheelbase
2600 mm
Length
4100 mm
(+17 mm)
Note E12
2013 - 2016
Length
4100 mm
Height
1535 mm
Wheelbase
2600 mm
Length
4100 mm
Compare all generations
1933
1933
Nissan founded
2006
2006
E11 was introduced.
2009
2009
E11 (1. Facelift) was introduced and replaced E11.
2013
2013
E12 was introduced and replaced E11 (1. Facelift).
2016
2016
The production of Nissan Note was discontinued.
Similar cars
VW Touran
2015
•
5T
Body type
Minivan
Length
4527 mm
Width
1829 mm
Height
1668 mm
Wheelbase
2786 mm
Boot capacity
834 l
Weight
1436 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Dacia Jogger
2022
•
DJF
Body type
Minivan
Length
4547 mm
Width
1784 mm
Height
1674 mm
Wheelbase
2897 mm
Boot capacity
160 l
Weight
1280 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Maxus Euniq 5
2023
•
SV5A
Body type
Minivan
Length
4825 mm
Width
1825 mm
Height
1800 mm
Wheelbase
2800 mm
Weight
1810 kg
Doors
5
Compare
KIA Stonic
2017
•
YB
Body type
SUV
Length
4140 mm
Width
1760 mm
Height
1505 mm
Wheelbase
2580 mm
Boot capacity
352 l
Weight
1145 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Skoda Fabia
2021
•
PJ
Body type
Hatchback
Length
4108 mm
Width
1780 mm
Height
1459 mm
Wheelbase
2564 mm
Boot capacity
380 l
Weight
1116 kg
Doors
5
Compare
SEAT Ibiza
2021
•
KJ
Body type
Hatchback
Length
4059 mm
Width
1780 mm
Height
1447 mm
Wheelbase
2564 mm
Boot capacity
355 l
Weight
1111 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Dacia Sandero
2020
•
DJF
Body type
Hatchback
Length
4088 mm
Width
1848 mm
Height
1499 mm
Wheelbase
2604 mm
Boot capacity
328 l
Weight
1089 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Citroen C3 Aircross
2024
•
C
Body type
SUV
Length
4395 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1660 mm
Wheelbase
2670 mm
Boot capacity
460 l
Weight
1373 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Hyundai i20
2023
•
BC3
Body type
Hatchback
Length
4065 mm
Width
1775 mm
Height
1450 mm
Wheelbase
2580 mm
Boot capacity
352 l
Weight
1088 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Renault Clio
2023
•
RJA
Body type
Hatchback
Length
4053 mm
Width
1798 mm
Height
1440 mm
Wheelbase
2583 mm
Boot capacity
391 l
Weight
1124 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Compare against all competitors
Compare with ...
Find the Perfect Match
Compare your car with other models
Comparing with:
Nissan Note (2013)
Select Make
Select Model
Compare Cars
Crashtest
1.
Overall
rating
78%
2.
Child
passenger safety
82%
3.
Adult
passenger safety
86%
4.
Pedestrian
protection
58%
5.
Safety
assistance systems
70%
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
echo ''; // Add smooth scrolling JS for the generations and variants containers echo '';