When it comes to dimensions, the Ford Kuga is generally larger than the Skoda Karoq. The Kuga measures 4614mm in length, whereas the Karoq is slightly shorter at 4390mm. The Kuga also has a wider wheelbase (2710mm) compared to the Karoq (2638mm), as well as greater width (1883mm) and width including mirrors (2178mm). The Kuga is also taller, with a height of 1661mm compared to the Karoq's 1603mm. The ground clearance varies between different engine types for both cars, with the Kuga having a minimum clearance of 160mm (2.5 PHEV ST-Line CVT) and a maximum clearance of 191mm (1.5 EcoBoost Titanium), while the Karoq has a minimum clearance of 163mm (1.0 TSI Active) and a maximum clearance of 176mm (2.0 TDI Ambition 4x4 DSG). Finally, the Kuga's turning circle ranges between 11.4 meters (1.5 EcoBoost Titanium) and 11.5 meters (1.5 EcoBoost ST-Line), whereas the Karoq's turning circle ranges between 10.2 meters (1.0 TSI Active) and 10.9 meters (2.0 TDI Ambition 4x4 DSG).
In conclusion, the Ford Kuga is generally larger in terms of dimensions compared to the Skoda Karoq, making it more spacious for occupants and cargo.
When it comes to boot and interior space, the Skoda Karoq has an advantage with a larger boot capacity of 521 liters compared to the Ford Kuga's 405 to 435 liters, depending on the engine type. With the rear seats folded, the Karoq also offers more space, with a total capacity of 1630 liters compared to the Kuga's 1534 liters. Both vehicles offer seating for 5 passengers and the same number of doors (5). Isofix child seat fittings come as standard in both vehicles.
In conclusion, the Skoda Karoq offers more boot and interior space compared to the Ford Kuga, making it a better option for those looking for more storage and practicality.
The Ford Kuga and Skoda Karoq both have a variety of engines with differing specifications. The number of gears in the Kuga ranges from 1 to 8, depending on the engine type, while the Karoq has 6 to 7 gears. Both vehicles have engine options with 3 to 4 cylinders. The Kuga's engines offer a maximum speed between 177km/h and 208km/h and a power output between 88kW and 165kW. The Karoq's engines deliver a maximum speed between 191km/h and 221km/h and a power output between 81kW and 140kW. Torque range is also different, with the Kuga having values between 240Nm and 400Nm and the Karoq between 200Nm and 360Nm. The cubic capacity of the engines varies between 1496ccm and 2488ccm for the Kuga and 999ccm and 1984ccm for the Karoq. Acceleration from 0 to 100km/h ranges from 8.7s to 12.0s for the Kuga and from 7.0s to 11.1s for the Karoq.
In conclusion, while there are similarities in the engine types and drivetrain components, there are notable differences in performance metrics between the Ford Kuga and Skoda Karoq.
In terms of fuel consumption and ecology, the Ford Kuga has a tank size between 45 and 54 liters depending on the engine type, while the Skoda Karoq has a tank size between 50 and 55 liters. The vehicles have different CO2 emissions (WLTP), with the Kuga producing between 22g/km and 159g/km, and the Karoq generating between 112g/km and 171g/km. Both vehicles have different tire sizes: the Kuga has 225/65R17 tires, while the Karoq has 215/60R16 tires. Noise levels for both models range from 65dB to 70dB. The Karoq also provides city and combined consumption figures (NEDC) ranging from 4.1 to 6.6 liters/100km for combined and 5.1 to 8.1 liters/100km for city consumption.
In conclusion, both vehicles have differences in fuel consumption, emissions, and ecology figures. The optimal choice depends on the specific needs and priorities of the buyer, such as fuel efficiency or eco-friendliness.
Comparing the weight and towing capacity of the Ford Kuga and Skoda Karoq, the Kuga's empty weight ranges between 1564kg and 1844kg, while the Karoq weighs between 1365kg and 1607kg. The Kuga's permissible total weight ranges from 2075kg to 2320kg, compared to the Karoq's range of 1890kg to 2179kg. In terms of braked trailer capacity, both vehicles have a range of 1200kg to 2100kg. The Kuga has a consistent unbraked trailer capacity of 750kg, while the Karoq's capacity varies between 670kg and 750kg. Both vehicles have an equal max roof load of 75kg, but the Kuga has a slightly higher max towbar load of 100kg compared to the Karoq's 90kg.
In conclusion, the Ford Kuga and Skoda Karoq are quite similar in terms of weight and towing capacity, with only slight variations in specific areas.
When comparing offroad capabilities, the Ford Kuga generally has a higher departure angle, ranging from 22.6 degrees to 24.4 degrees, while the Karoq has a range of 19.4 degrees to 19.8 degrees. The approach angles are similar, with the Kuga ranging from 18.0 degrees to 19.3 degrees and the Karoq ranging from 18.3 degrees to 18.8 degrees.
In conclusion, although the offroad capabilities are quite similar in terms of approach angle, the Ford Kuga has a higher departure angle, which could provide better performance in offroad conditions.
In terms of electric vehicle features, the Ford Kuga has a range (WLTP) between 56km and 65km, depending on the engine type, and a battery capacity between 1.1kWh and 14.4kWh. The Skoda Karoq does not have an electric version at the moment.
In conclusion, the Ford Kuga offers electric options for those interested in an eco-friendly vehicle, while the Skoda Karoq does not have any electric variants currently available.