Comparison:Peugeot 2008 2023 (new) Vs. Skoda Karoq 2021 (new)

Dimensions

The Skoda Karoq surpasses the Peugeot 2008 in terms of dimensions, with a length, width, wheelbase, and height of 4390mm, 1841mm, 2638mm, and 1603mm, respectively. These figures provide the Karoq with a more spacious interior, and consequently, a more comfortable driving experience. The Peugeot 2008 measures 4300mm in length, 1770mm in width, 2605mm wheelbase, and 1530mm in height. When it comes to turning circles, the Peugeot 2008 beats the Karoq by a small margin, offering a 10.40m turning circle as opposed to a minimum of 10.20m (1.0 TSI Active) and a maximum of 10.90m (2.0 TDI Ambition 4x4 DSG) in the Karoq. Additionally, the Karoq boasts ground clearance levels ranging from 163mm to 176mm.

Boot/interior

The Skoda Karoq takes the lead when it comes to boot and interior space, offering 521 liters of boot space compared to the Peugeot 2008's 405 liters. With rear seats folded, the Karoq's boot space increases to 1630 liters (up to the roof), while the 2008 offers 1467 liters. Both vehicles provide seating for up to five passengers and feature standard Isofix child seat anchorage points.

Engines/drivetrain

The Peugeot 2008 is available with up to 8 gears (1.2 PureTech 130 Active EAT8) and the Skoda Karoq with up to 7 gears (1.5 TSI Ambition DSG). Both cars feature a variety of 3- or 4-cylinder engines, with maximum speeds of 208 km/h (1.2 PureTech 155 GT EAT8) for the 2008 and 221 km/h (2.0 TSI Sportline 4x4 DSG) for the Karoq. The engines of the Karoq produce a wider power range, with 81-140 kW, compared to the 2008's 74-114 kW. Moreover, the torque potential of the Skoda Karoq extends from 200 Nm to 360 Nm, exceeding that of the 2008, which ranges from 205 Nm to 300 Nm. The Karoq also offers larger cubic capacities, extending from 999 ccm to 1984 ccm, while the Peugeot 2008's capacity varies between 1199 ccm and 1499 ccm. As for acceleration, the Karoq provides a quicker 0-100 km/h time, with a minimum of 7.0 seconds and a maximum of 11.1 seconds.

Consumption/ecology

Thanks to its greater tank size of 50-55 liters, the Skoda Karoq beats the Peugeot 2008 in terms of fuel capacity (41-44 liters). However, the Peugeot 2008 does have an edge in terms of NEDC combined consumption, with figures ranging from 3.6 L/100 km to 5.0 L/100 km, as well as city consumption, which falls between 4.2 L/100 km and 5.8 L/100 km. In terms of CO2 emissions (WLTP), both vehicles are evenly matched, with figures ranging from 112 g/km to 153 g/km for the Karoq and 116 g/km to 139 g/km for the 2008. When it comes to tire sizes, both the Peugeot 2008 and Skoda Karoq feature 215/65R16 and 215/60R16 tires, respectively. Noise levels of the 2008 vary from 64 dB to 69 dB, while those of the Karoq range between 65 dB and 70 dB.

Weight/towing

The Peugeot 2008 has a larger variation in empty weight, with a minimum of 1263 kg and a maximum of 1623 kg, compared to the Skoda Karoq's 1365 kg to 1607 kg. The Karoq's permissible total weight, ranging from 1890 kg to 2179 kg, is greater than that of the 2008 (1710 kg to 2030 kg). In terms of braked trailer capacity, the Peugeot 2008 can handle 1200 kg, while the Karoq's range extends from 1200 kg to 2100 kg. The Karoq also boasts a higher ability to tow unbraked trailers, supporting weights of 670 kg to 750 kg, compared to the 2008's 630 kg to 670 kg. Roof load and towbar load specifications are similarly in favor of the Skoda Karoq, with values of 75 kg and 90 kg, respectively, surpassing the Peugeot 2008's 70 kg and 48 kg to 61 kg.

Offroad

Although the Peugeot 2008 lacks some off-road data, the Skoda Karoq showcases its prowess in this area. With departure angles ranging from 19.4° to 19.8° and approach angles of 18.3° to 18.8°, it is capable of tackling various terrain types with ease.

EV

The Peugeot 2008 EV model offers a WLTP range of 341 km to 342 km. The total battery capacity is 50 kWh, and the usable capacity is 48.1 kWh. While the Skoda Karoq does not provide an electric alternative, its comprehensive range of engine options ensures a variety of choices for drivers seeking to balance power and fuel efficiency.