Comparison:Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 Vs. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new)

#	Mitsubishi Pajero Classic	Ford Transit Connect

Generation	2G 2005 - 2007 Change selected generation	Transit Connect 2. Generation (1. Facelift) (P*2) 2018 - Now Change selected generation
Body		Small Commercial Van
Doors		3
Vehicle class		Compact car (e.g., Golf)
Engine	Select engine for the exact values to be shown	Select engine for the exact values to be shown
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Dimensions

Length

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) 4425 mm

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Wheelbase

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) 2662 mm

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Width

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) 1836 mm

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Width including mirrors

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) 2138 mm

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Height

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) 1860 mm

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Ground clearance

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 148 mm

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Turning circle

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 12.50 m

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Boot/interior

Boot space

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 1500 l

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to roof)

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) 2600 l

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Seats

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) 2

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Max. seats

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) 3

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Doors

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) 3

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Engines/drivetrain

Drive

1. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

2. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) Front-wheel drive,

Fuel

1. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

2. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) Diesel, Premium,

Gearbox

1. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

2. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) Manual Transmission, Automatic Transmission,

Gears

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 8

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Cylinders

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 4

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Max. speed

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 171 km/h

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Power

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 88 kW

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Torque

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 270 Nm

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Cubic capacity

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 1499 ccm

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Acceleration 0-100km/h

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 13.3 s

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Consumption/ecology

Tank size

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 60 l

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Combined consumption (NEDC)

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 5.1 l/100km

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

City consumption (NEDC)

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 5.4 l/100km

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

CO2 emissions (WLTP)

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 157.0 g/km

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Emission standard

1. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

2. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) Euro 6d-TEMP (WLTP) 36AG-AI, Truck, Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP-ISC (WLTP) 36CH, 36CI, 36DG, , Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR

Tyre size

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) 205/60R16

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Noise

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 372 dB

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Weight/towing

Empty weight (EU)

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 1771 kg

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Permissible total weight

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 2501 kg

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Braked trailer

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 1500 kg

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Trailer (no brakes)

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 750 kg

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Max. roof load

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) 75 kg

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Max. towbar load

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , 75 kg

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Offroad

Ramp angle

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , °

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Maximum incline

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , °

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Departure angle

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , °

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Approach angle

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , °

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Fording

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , mm

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

EV

Range (WLTP)

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , km

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Battery capacity - total

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , kWh

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Battery capacity - usable

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , kWh

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Battery weight

1. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new) , kg

2. Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 ?

Comparison:Mitsubishi Pajero Classic 2005 Vs. Ford Transit Connect 2018 (new)

Add to comparison

Dimensions

Boot/interior

Engines/drivetrain

Consumption/ecology

Weight/towing

Offroad

EV