Comparison:Mazda 3 2019 (new) Vs. Citroen XM 1994

#	Mazda 3	Citroen XM	Add to comparison New comparison

Generation	BP 2019 - Now Change selected generation	1.Generation (1. Facelift) (Y4) 1994 - 2000 Change selected generation
Body		Hatchback
Doors		5
Vehicle class		Upper mid-size car (e.g., E-Class)
Engine	Select engine for the exact values to be shown	Select engine for the exact values to be shown
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Dimensions

Length

1. Citroen XM 1994 4708 mm

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) ?

Wheelbase

1. Citroen XM 1994 2850 mm

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) ?

Width

1. Citroen XM 1994 1794 mm

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) ?

Height

1. Citroen XM 1994 1385 mm

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) ?

Ground clearance

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 135 mm

2. Citroen XM 1994 ?

Turning circle

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 11.40 m

2. Citroen XM 1994 11.70 m

Boot/interior

Boot space

1. Citroen XM 1994 455 - 750 l

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 351 l

Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to roof)

1. Citroen XM 1994 1460 l

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) ?

Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to windows)

1. Citroen XM 1994 1020 l

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) ?

Seats

1. Citroen XM 1994 5

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) ?

Doors

1. Citroen XM 1994 5

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) ?

Engines/drivetrain

Drive

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , Front-wheel drive

2. Citroen XM 1994 Front-wheel drive

Fuel

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , Premium

2. Citroen XM 1994 Premium, Diesel

Gearbox

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , Manual Transmission, Automatic Transmission

2. Citroen XM 1994 Manual Transmission, Automatic Transmission

Gears

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 6

2. Citroen XM 1994 4 - 5

Cylinders

1. Citroen XM 1994 4 - 6

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 4

Max. speed

1. Citroen XM 1994 180 - 235 km/h

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 216 km/h

Power

1. Citroen XM 1994 80 - 147 kW

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 137 kW

Torque

1. Citroen XM 1994 180 - 285 Nm

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 240 Nm

Cubic capacity

1. Citroen XM 1994 1998 - 2946 ccm

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 1998 ccm

Acceleration 0-100km/h

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 10.8 s

2. Citroen XM 1994 8.0 - 15.4 s

Consumption/ecology

Tank size

1. Citroen XM 1994 80 l

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 51 l

Combined consumption (NEDC)

1. Citroen XM 1994 7.1 - 11.9 l/100km

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , l/100km

City consumption (NEDC)

1. Citroen XM 1994 9.6 - 18.0 l/100km

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , l/100km

CO2 emissions (WLTP)

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 138.0 g/km

2. Citroen XM 1994 ?

Emission standard

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR

2. Citroen XM 1994 D3, Euro 2 (up to 2500kg)

Tyre size

1. Citroen XM 1994 195/65R15

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) ?

Noise

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 66 dB

2. Citroen XM 1994 ?

Weight/towing

Empty weight (EU)

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 1462 kg

2. Citroen XM 1994 1461 - 1730 kg

Permissible total weight

1. Citroen XM 1994 2000 - 2270 kg

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 1963 kg

Braked trailer

1. Citroen XM 1994 1300 - 1500 kg

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 1300 kg

Trailer (no brakes)

1. Citroen XM 1994 740 - 750 kg

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 600 kg

Max. roof load

1. Citroen XM 1994 80 kg

2. Mazda 3 2019 (new) ?

Max. towbar load

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , 75 kg

2. Citroen XM 1994 ?

Offroad

Ramp angle

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , °

2. Citroen XM 1994 ?

Maximum incline

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , °

2. Citroen XM 1994 ?

Departure angle

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , °

2. Citroen XM 1994 ?

Approach angle

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , °

2. Citroen XM 1994 ?

Fording

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , mm

2. Citroen XM 1994 ?

EV

Range (WLTP)

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , km

2. Citroen XM 1994 ?

Battery capacity - total

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , kWh

2. Citroen XM 1994 ?

Battery capacity - usable

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , kWh

2. Citroen XM 1994 ?

Battery weight

1. Mazda 3 2019 (new) , kg

2. Citroen XM 1994 ?

Comparison:Mazda 3 2019 (new) Vs. Citroen XM 1994

Add to comparison

Dimensions

Boot/interior

Engines/drivetrain

Consumption/ecology

Weight/towing

Offroad

EV