Comparison:Jeep Compass 2025 (new) Vs. Ford Kuga 2024 (new)

Dimensions

The Ford Kuga is larger in several dimensions compared to the Jeep Compass. It is longer (4614mm), wider (1883mm) and boasts a greater wheelbase (2710mm). The Kuga also provides a higher ground clearance, with its maximum value of 191mm found in the 1.5 EcoBoost Titanium model. In comparison, the Jeep Compass' 1.3 GSE T4 Sport has a maximum ground clearance of 213mm. The Jeep Compass outshines the Kuga in terms of turning circle, at just 11.10m, which could make it easier to manoeuvre in tight spots. The Kuga is also taller, standing at 1661mm, which could provide better visibility in some situations.

Boot/interior

When it comes to boot space, the Ford Kuga and the Jeep Compass have some differences. The Kuga's boot space ranges from 405l to 435l depending on the engine type, while the Compass has slightly more variety in its range, from 420l to 438l. In terms of space with the rear seats folded, the Kuga offers 1534l of space, considerably more than the 1387l of the Compass. Both vehicles feature 5 seats, making them suitable for families or small groups of passengers.

Engines/drivetrain

The range of engines for the Ford Kuga is greater than that of the Jeep Compass, with gearbox options ranging from 1 to 8 gears, with engine examples including the 2.5 PHEV ST-Line CVT (1 gear) and the 2.0 EcoBlue ST-Line Allroad (8 gears). In comparison, the Jeep Compass offers just 6-7 gears, with the 1.3 GSE T4 Sport and the 1.5 GSE T4 48V e-Hybrid Limited DKG being two notable examples. The Kuga's power range varies between 88kW and 165kW, with examples including its 1.5 EcoBoost Trend and 2.5 PHEV ST-Line CVT, while the Compass' power range goes from 96kW to 177kW, with its 1.3 GSE T4 Sport and 1.3 T4-PHEV S 4xe Automatik. The Ford Kuga has a wider spread of acceleration times for 0-100km/h, from 8.7 seconds to 12 seconds, while the Compass falls between 7.3 and 10.6 seconds. Overall, both vehicles offer a range of engine options suited to various driver preferences, with the Kuga offering a wider selection of gearbox options.

Consumption/ecology

The Ford Kuga and the Jeep Compass have variations in terms of fuel consumption and emissions. The Kuga's tank size ranges between 45l and 54l, while the Compass' tank varies from 37l to 55l. CO2 emissions are essential for ecology-minded drivers, and the Kuga's values range from 22.0g/km to 159.0g/km depending on the engine type, with a 2.5 Plugin-Hybrid Titanium CVT at the low end and a 2.0 EcoBlue ST-Line Allroad at the high end. The Compass' emissions range from 41.0g/km for a 1.3 T4-PHEV S 4xe Automatik to 157.0g/km for a 1.3 GSE T4 Limited model. While both vehicles have a focus on reducing their ecological impact, the Ford Kuga offers slightly lower emission options for drivers with a green agenda.

Weight/towing

The Ford Kuga has an empty weight range extending from 1564kg to 1844kg, while the Jeep Compass is slightly lighter, with an empty weight range of 1505kg to 1935kg. In terms of towing capabilities, the Kuga can tow between 1200kg and 2100kg (braked) depending on the specific model, while the Compass can handle between 1325kg and 1825kg with a braked trailer. When it comes to trailer towing without brakes, the Kuga is the superior option with 750kg capacity compared to the Compass' 600kg. Overall, while both vehicles offer a good range of towing capacities, the Kuga offers a bit more capacity for those who need the extra weight.

Offroad

In terms of offroad capabilities, the Jeep Compass outshines the Ford Kuga significantly. With a higher departure angle (30.80° to 33.30°) and approach angle (15.80° to 30.40°), the Compass offers better offroad handling than the Kuga, which has departure angles of 22.60° to 24.40° and approach angles of 18.00° to 19.30°. The Jeep Compass also features a higher fording capability, ranging between 406m and 483m. Thus, for drivers who plan to take their vehicle on offroad adventures, the Jeep Compass is a much better choice.

EV

For those interested in electric vehicles, the Ford Kuga has a more extensive range of electric driving capabilities, with the WLTP range spanning between 56km and 65km. On the other hand, the Jeep Compass offers a range of 47km to 48km. Moreover, the Kuga's battery capacity ranges between 1.1kWh and 14.4kWh, while the Compass offers only a single option - 11.4kWh. In conclusion, for those who are looking for an SUV with electric capabilities, the Ford Kuga provides a greater range of options and better performance than the Jeep Compass.