Comparison:Hyundai Bayon 2021 (new) Vs. Skoda Kamiq 2024 (new)

Dimensions

In terms of dimensions, the Skoda Kamiq is slightly longer at 4241 mm compared to the Hyundai Bayon's 4180 mm and boasts a greater wheelbase standing at 2651 mm against the Bayon's 2580 mm. The Kamiq is marginally wider, excluding mirrors, by 18 mm. However, the Bayon takes the lead with its width including mirrors at 2040 mm, compared to the Kamiq's narrower 1990 mm. Standing tall, the Kamiq reaches a height of 1527 mm, exceeding the Bayon by 37 mm. The Bayon sits lower to the ground with a clearance of 165 mm, while the Kamiq offers a varied clearance of 182 mm to 188 mm, depending on the engine variant. Turning radii favor the Bayon with a modest 10.40 m compared to the Kamiq's 10.80 - 10.90 m range. The conclusion here points to the Skoda Kamiq being a slightly larger vehicle offering potentially more cabin space, while the Hyundai Bayon offers better maneuverability.

Boot/interior

Moving to cargo space, the Hyundai Bayon has a boot that varies from 334 to 411 liters depending on the engine, while the Skoda Kamiq ranges a tighter 278 to 400 liters. When the rear seats are folded, the Kamiq edges out with 1273 liters against the Bayon's 1205 liters of space. Both vehicles offer seating for five and come equipped with standard Isofix points, ensuring child seat compatibility and safety. The upshot is that while both vehicles offer similar seating arrangements, the Kamiq offers a tad more maximum cargo space when seats are folded.

Engines/drivetrain

Examining the gears, both the Hyundai Bayon and Skoda Kamiq offer transmission options ranging from 5-speed to 7-speed, depending on the engine choice. Cylinder count between both vehicles also matches, offering 3 to 4-cylinder configurations. Hyundai Bayon's engines range in power from 62 to 88 kW, whilst the Kamiq offers a broader range from 66 to 110 kW. Similarly, torque for the Bayon spans from 118 to 200 Nm, while the Kamiq goes higher, offering between 160 and 250 Nm. The cubic capacity of the Bayon's engines range between 998 to 1197 ccm, compared to the Kamiq's 999 to 1598 ccm range. Acceleration from 0-100 km/h for the Bayon varies from 10.4 to 13.5 seconds with the Kamiq covering a quicker range of 8.0 to 12.5 seconds. In summary, the Skoda Kamiq shows a broader power spectrum and faster acceleration, catering to those seeking a more spirited driving experience.

Consumption/ecology

The Hyundai Bayon comes with a fixed 40-liter fuel tank, while the Skoda Kamiq offers a variable tank size ranging from 14 to 50 liters, tailored to the engine choice. CO2 emissions based on the WLTP standard have the Bayon emitting between 124.0 to 129.0 g/km, whereas the Kamiq has a wider spread from 100.0 to 147.0 g/km, suggesting different engine efficiencies. Noise levels for the Bayon are evenly matched between 68 to 69 dB depending on the engine, while the Kamiq's noise level varies more significantly from 64 to 70 dB. Thus, the Kamiq proves to have a more varied ecological and consumption profile, potentially offering both more economical and performance-oriented options.

Weight/towing

The minimum empty weight (EU standard) for the Hyundai Bayon is a light 1045 kg, reaching up to 1145 kg for different engines. The Skoda Kamiq is heavier, starting at 1214 kg and peaking at 1364 kg. Permissible total weight mirrors this trend, with the Bayon at a lower 1580 to 1680 kg range against the Kamiq’s 1696 to 1857 kg. When it comes to towing, the Bayon's braked trailer limit is set between 910 to 1110 kg versus the Kamiq's stronger 1150 to 1250 kg range. Without brakes, the Bayon stands at 450 kg, while the Kamiq ranges from 600 to 680 kg. Both vehicles support the same maximum towbar load at 75 kg, but the Kamiq allows a slightly higher roof load at 75 kg compared to the Bayon's 70 kg. The Bayon is the lighter and more easily maneuverable option, while the Kamiq supports more weight overall, both in cargo and towing capacity.