Comparison:Ford EcoSport 2017 Vs. KIA Retona 1999

#	Ford EcoSport	KIA Retona	Add to comparison New comparison

Generation	1.Generation (1. Facelift) (JK8) 2017 - 2022 Change selected generation	CE (CE) 1999 - 2001 Change selected generation
Body	SUV	SUV
Doors	5	3
Vehicle class	Subcompact car (e.g., Polo)	Compact car (e.g., Golf)
Engine	Select engine for the exact values to be shown	Select engine for the exact values to be shown
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Dimensions

Length

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 4096 mm

2. KIA Retona 1999 4000 mm

Wheelbase

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 2519 mm

2. KIA Retona 1999 2360 mm

Width

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 1765 mm

2. KIA Retona 1999 1745 mm

Width including mirrors

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 2057 mm

2. KIA Retona 1999 ?

Height

1. KIA Retona 1999 1835 mm

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 1653 mm

Ground clearance

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 160 - 162 mm

2. KIA Retona 1999 ?

Turning circle

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 10.60 - 11.20 m

2. KIA Retona 1999 ?

Boot/interior

Boot space

1. KIA Retona 1999 394 l

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 321 l

Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to roof)

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 1145 l

2. KIA Retona 1999 ?

Seats

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 5

2. KIA Retona 1999 5

Doors

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 5

2. KIA Retona 1999 3

Isofix

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 Serie

2. KIA Retona 1999 nicht bekannt

Engines/drivetrain

Drive

1. KIA Retona 1999 All-wheel drive

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 Front-wheel drive, All-wheel drive

Fuel

1. KIA Retona 1999 Diesel, Regular

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 Premium, Diesel

Gearbox

1. KIA Retona 1999 Manual Transmission

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 Manual Transmission, Automatic Transmission

Gears

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 6

2. KIA Retona 1999 5

Cylinders

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 3 - 4

2. KIA Retona 1999 4

Max. speed

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 160 - 190 km/h

2. KIA Retona 1999 124 - 150 km/h

Power

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 70 - 103 kW

2. KIA Retona 1999 61 - 94 kW

Torque

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 170 - 300 Nm

2. KIA Retona 1999 175 - 195 Nm

Cubic capacity

1. KIA Retona 1999 1998 ccm

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 998 - 1499 ccm

Acceleration 0-100km/h

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 10.2 - 14.0 s

2. KIA Retona 1999 20.5 s

Consumption/ecology

Tank size

1. KIA Retona 1999 53 - 60 l

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 52 l

Combined consumption (NEDC)

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 4.1 - 6.2 l/100km

2. KIA Retona 1999 9.9 - 10.6 l/100km

City consumption (NEDC)

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 4.5 - 7.6 l/100km

2. KIA Retona 1999 11.5 - 12.8 l/100km

Combined consumption (WLTP)

1. KIA Retona 1999 ?

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 5.9 l/100km

CO2 emissions (WLTP)

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 132.0 - 166.0 g/km

2. KIA Retona 1999 ?

Emission standard

1. KIA Retona 1999 Euro 2 (up to 2500kg)

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 Euro 6b (NEDC), Euro 6d-TEMP (WLTP) 36AG-AI, Euro 6d-TEMP-EVAP-ISC (WLTP) 36CH, 36CI, 36DG, Euro 6d-ISC-FCM (WLTP) 36AP-AR

Tyre size

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 205/60R16

2. KIA Retona 1999 215/75R15

Noise

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 66 - 70 dB

2. KIA Retona 1999 ?

Weight/towing

Empty weight (EU)

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 1343 - 1520 kg

2. KIA Retona 1999 1510 - 1541 kg

Permissible total weight

1. KIA Retona 1999 1903 kg

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 1725 - 1895 kg

Braked trailer

1. KIA Retona 1999 1500 kg

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 750 - 1100 kg

Trailer (no brakes)

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 675 - 750 kg

2. KIA Retona 1999 465 kg

Max. roof load

1. KIA Retona 1999 50 kg

2. Ford EcoSport 2017 40 kg

Max. towbar load

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 30 - 75 kg

2. KIA Retona 1999 ?

Offroad

Ramp angle

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 23.30 °

2. KIA Retona 1999 ?

Departure angle

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 33.30 °

2. KIA Retona 1999 ?

Approach angle

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 21.00 °

2. KIA Retona 1999 ?

Fording

1. Ford EcoSport 2017 550.00 mm

2. KIA Retona 1999 ?

Comparison:Ford EcoSport 2017 Vs. KIA Retona 1999

Add to comparison

Dimensions

Boot/interior

Engines/drivetrain

Consumption/ecology

Weight/towing

Offroad