Length
Wheelbase
Width
Width including mirrors
Height
Ground clearance
Turning circle
Boot/interior
In terms of boot and interior space, the Renault Zoe has a clear advantage. It offers more boot space (338 liters) compared to the Citroen C-Zero (166 liters). Additionally, the Zoe has a larger storage capacity with the rear seats folded (1225 liters) when compared to the C-Zero (860 liters). The Renault Zoe can also accommodate 5 passengers as opposed to the Citroen C-Zero's 4-passenger capacity. Both vehicles have 5 doors, and both come with Isofix as standard. To conclude, the Renault Zoe offers a more spacious boot and interior when compared to the Citroen C-Zero.
Boot space
Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to roof)
Boot space (rear seats folded, bottom to windows)
Seats
Doors
Isofix
Engines/drivetrain
Both vehicles utilize one-gear drivetrains due to their electric nature. The performance parameters, however, are quite different. The Renault Zoe offers a wider range of engine options, with the powerful R135 Z.E. 50 Experience offering a maximum speed of 140km/h, while the slower R110 Z.E. 40 Life achieves 135km/h. In contrast, the Citroen C-Zero reaches a maximum speed of 130km/h. Additionally, the Zoe has better power and torque capabilities compared to the C-Zero. The 0 to 100km/h acceleration is faster for the Zoe, with the R135 Z.E. 50 Experience hitting the mark in 9.5 seconds and the R110 Z.E. 40 Life doing it in 11.4 seconds. The C-Zero, on the other hand, takes 15.9 seconds to reach the same speed. In summary, the Renault Zoe holds the upper hand when it comes to engine and drivetrain performance.
Drive
Fuel
Gearbox
Gears
Cylinders
Max. speed
Power
Torque
Cubic capacity
Acceleration 0-100km/h
Consumption/ecology
As electric vehicles, both the Citroen C-Zero and Renault Zoe are eco-friendly alternatives to traditional combustion engine cars. The C-Zero boasts lower noise levels (66dB) compared to the Zoe's 68dB (R135 Z.E. 50 Experience) and 70dB (R110 Z.E. 40 Life) while the Zoe has larger tire size. In terms of combined consumption (NEDC), the C-Zero has a consumption of 12.6 to 13.5 kWh, depending on the engine model. Overall, the consumption and ecology parameters for both vehicles are quite similar, with the main difference being the noise levels.
Tank size
Combined consumption (NEDC)
City consumption (NEDC)
Combined consumption (WLTP)
CO2 emissions (WLTP)
Emission standard
Tyre size
Noise
Weight/towing
When it comes to weight and towing, the Citroen C-Zero and Renault Zoe have their pros and cons. The C-Zero offers a lower empty weight (1140-1195kg) and a higher permissible total weight (1450kg), which can be beneficial for the overall driving experience. On the other hand, the Zoe has no maximum roof load capacity, whereas the C-Zero offers a maximum roof load of 43kg. To sum up, the Citroen C-Zero has better weight distribution and flexibility when compared to the Renault Zoe.
Empty weight (EU)
Permissible total weight
Braked trailer
Trailer (no brakes)
Max. roof load
Max. towbar load
Offroad
Ramp angle
Maximum incline
Departure angle
Approach angle
Fording
EV
The electric vehicle-specific parameters are where the Renault Zoe genuinely shines. The Zoe offers a considerably longer range (316.0 to 395.0km) than the Citroen C-Zero (100.0km), thanks to its more substantial battery capacity (44.1 to 55.0 kWh for the Zoe, as opposed to the C-Zero's 16.0 kWh). Additionally, the Zoe offers a wider range of charging options and compatibility, as it supports both 1-phase and 3-phase AC charging, while the C-Zero is limited to 1-phase charging. The charging port positions are also different for both vehicles, with the Zoe's charging port located at the front center, and the C-Zero's positioned at the passenger's side rear. In conclusion, the Renault Zoe offers superior electric vehicle parameters when compared to the Citroen C-Zero, making it a more practical, long-range electric vehicle option.