Comparison: Approach angle Mitsubishi Outlander vs. competitors 2025

Exploring the realms of driving ruggedness and capability, the Mitsubishi Outlander stands as an alluring contender in the SUV market. Its approach angle—a crucial metric in off-roading that indicates how steep an incline the vehicle can approach without the front bumper hitting the ground—reflects its true 4x4 spirit. While it doesn’t exactly tower over rocks with the arrogance of a full-sized Land Rover, it does offer enough brawn to get you through the occasional adventure. Today, let’s sink our teeth into the Outlander’s approach angle, its evolution through different generations, its place in the Mitsubishi lineup, and how it measures up against other road warriors.

Mitsubishi Outlander - How has the approach angle changed over the generations?

Starting from the first-generation model introduced in 2003, the Mitsubishi Outlander has seen considerable shifts in its approach angle over the years. The first iteration from 2003 to 2007 didn’t make much of an off-roading impression with no explicit mention of its approach angle. However, with the second generation that spanned from 2007 to 2012, Mitsubishi injected some vigor into its design, sporting a commendable 22° approach angle. One would think this newfound agility would persist, but curiously, the subsequent third generation from 2012 onward saw a drop, with the figures betraying an absence of recorded data. This makes one yearn for the clarity seen in their 2007-2012 lineup, leaving us hanging in the murk of ambiguity.

Mitsubishi Outlander generations
Mitsubishi Outlander generations
Generation yearApproach angle
Outlander, Model year 2007 (2.Generation)22 °
Outlander, Model year 2010 (2.Generation (1. Facelift))22 °
Outlander, Model year 2003 (1.Generation)0 °
Outlander, Model year 2012 (3.Generation)0 °
Outlander, Model year 2015 (3.Generation (1. Facelift))0 °
Outlander, Model year 2018 (3.Generation (2. Facelift))0 °
Outlander, Model year 2024 (Outlander 4. Generation)0 °
  • Outlander, Model year 2007 (2.Generation) 22 °
  • Outlander, Model year 2010 ) (2.Generation (1. Facelift) 22 °
  • Outlander, Model year 2003 (1.Generation) 0 °
  • Outlander, Model year 2012 (3.Generation) 0 °
  • Outlander, Model year 2015 ) (3.Generation (1. Facelift) 0 °
  • Outlander, Model year 2018 ) (3.Generation (2. Facelift) 0 °
  • Outlander, Model year 2024 (Outlander 4. Generation) 0 °
The difference in Approach angle between first generation (1.Generation) from 2003 and last generation (Outlander 4. Generation) from 2024 is 0 °.
The approach angle of the current generation of Outlander is 0 °.

The approach angle compared to other Mitsubishi models

Within the hierarchy of Mitsubishi's SUV lineup, the Outlander finds itself jostling for space with models like the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross, which boasts an approach angle of 20.4°. It’s a shade lower than the Outlander during its prime years of 2007-2012. However, for those who fancy a more urban life with the occasional brush against the wild, the Eclipse Cross still has a respectable front stance. The Mitsubishi ASX, another sibling, also clocks in with a modest 19°, which is substantially lower than the Outlander's zenith. This relegates the Outlander to a middling position within the Mitsubishi family, not quite the best but certainly not the worst either.

Mitsubishi Outlander vs other current cars by Mitsubishi
Approach angle: Outlander vs. other models by Mitsubishi
Variant nameApproach angle
Eclipse Cross20 °
  • Eclipse Cross 20 °

How does the approach angle of the Mitsubishi Outlander compare to it's nearest competitors?

When pitted against other manufacturers' daredevil machines, the Outlander holds its own but doesn’t outright dominate. For comparison, take the Dacia Duster with its audacious 30° approach angle—far steep than the Outlander’s best. Then there’s the Lynk & Co 01 at 19.4°, a competitor that almost matches the second-gen Outlander but still falls short. The Volvo XC40 comes close at 21.7°, inching nearer to the Outlander’s glory days but not quite tipping it over the top. The Jeep Compass and Mercedes-Benz EQB hover around the 21° mark, which essentially means an adventurer driving the Outlander would find very little disadvantage in comparison. It's all jolly good fun until you reach comparison with the likes of the Jeep Renegade at 17.9°, where you truly realize the Outlander's second-gen heights weren’t too shabby at all.

Mitsubishi Outlander vs. similar cars
Approach angle: Mitsubishi Outlander vs. similar cars
Car modelApproach angle
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross 202120 °
Lynk & Co 01 202419 °
WEY Coffee 01 202218 °
Toyota Highlander 202118 °
GWM WEY 05 202418 °
Mazda CX-60 202218 °
Mercedes-Benz EQA 202418 °
Lexus NX 201417 °
VW ID.4 202016 °
VW ID.5 202215 °
Toyota C-HR 202414 °
  • mitsubishiMitsubishi Eclipse Cross 2021 20 °
  • Lynk & Co 01 2024 19 °
  • weyWEY Coffee 01 2022 18 °
  • toyotaToyota Highlander 2021 18 °
  • GWM WEY 05 2024 18 °
  • mazdaMazda CX-60 2022 18 °
  • mercedes-benzMercedes-Benz EQA 2024 18 °
  • lexusLexus NX 2014 17 °
  • vwVW ID.4 2020 16 °
  • vwVW ID.5 2022 15 °
  • toyotaToyota C-HR 2024 14 °

Similar cars

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
mitsubishi Logo 2021GK0
Body type
SUV
Length
4545 mm
Width
1805 mm
Height
1685 mm
Wheelbase
2670 mm
Boot capacity
359 l
Weight
1985 kg
Doors
5
Compare
GWM WEY 03
2024V71-V61
Body type
SUV
Length
4688 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1730 mm
Wheelbase
2745 mm
Boot capacity
517 l
Weight
2295 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Honda CR-V
honda Logo 2023RS
Body type
SUV
Length
4706 mm
Width
1866 mm
Height
1684 mm
Wheelbase
2700 mm
Boot capacity
587 l
Weight
1875 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Suzuki Across
suzuki Logo 2020XA5P
Body type
SUV
Length
4635 mm
Width
1855 mm
Height
1690 mm
Wheelbase
2690 mm
Boot capacity
490 l
Weight
2015 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Honda ZR-V
honda Logo 2023RZ
Body type
SUV
Length
4568 mm
Width
1840 mm
Height
1613 mm
Wheelbase
2657 mm
Boot capacity
380 l
Weight
1675 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Renault Rafale
renault Logo 2024RHN
Body type
SUV
Length
4710 mm
Width
1886 mm
Height
1613 mm
Wheelbase
2738 mm
Boot capacity
627 l
Weight
1728 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Renault Espace
renault Logo 2025RHN
Body type
SUV
Length
4746 mm
Width
1830 mm
Height
1645 mm
Wheelbase
2738 mm
Boot capacity
692 l
Weight
1673 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Lynk & Co 01
2024CX11
Body type
SUV
Length
4545 mm
Width
1860 mm
Height
1694 mm
Wheelbase
2734 mm
Boot capacity
466 l
Weight
1905 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Toyota Corolla Cross
toyota Logo 2022XG1TJ
Body type
SUV
Length
4460 mm
Width
1825 mm
Height
1620 mm
Wheelbase
2640 mm
Boot capacity
414 l
Weight
1515 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Nissan Qashqai
nissan Logo 2024J12
Body type
SUV
Length
4425 mm
Width
1835 mm
Height
1625 mm
Wheelbase
2665 mm
Boot capacity
504 l
Weight
1665 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Toyota C-HR
toyota Logo 2024X20
Body type
SUV
Length
4362 mm
Width
1832 mm
Height
1558 mm
Wheelbase
2640 mm
Boot capacity
447 l
Weight
1505 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Renault Symbioz
renault Logo 2024RJB
Body type
SUV
Length
4413 mm
Width
1797 mm
Height
1575 mm
Wheelbase
2638 mm
Boot capacity
492 l
Weight
1498 kg
Doors
5
Compare
WEY Coffee 01
wey Logo 2022V71-V61
Body type
SUV
Length
4870 mm
Width
1960 mm
Height
1690 mm
Wheelbase
2910 mm
Weight
2335 kg
Doors
5
Compare

Compare with ...

Find the Perfect Match
Compare your car with other models
TOPlist