Comparison: Boot space Land Rover Freelander vs. competitors 2025
How much cargo can handle this medium SUV?
When it comes to the world of rugged charm and go-anywhere capability, few names roll off the tongue quite like Land Rover. Nestled comfortably in this illustrious lineup, the Land Rover Freelander has made a name for itself, catering to those with a penchant for adventure and a need for practicality. Its boot space, a measurement vitally important to weekend escapades and family treks alike, has evolved over the years. But how does it truly square up in the grand scheme of things?
Land Rover Freelander - How has the boot space changed over the generations?
Diving into the archives, the Freelander I popped onto the scene in 1998 with a rather modest boot, offering 311 litres of space, and expanding to a capacious 1190 litres with the rear seats folded. This storage arena wasn't exactly the eighth wonder of the world, but it was enough to fit your fancy hat collection and a picnic basket. During its first facelift, it held its ground, stubbornly keeping that same 311-litre capacity – but scoffed at the old model by adding a whopping 4 extra litres with the seats down. Enter the Freelander II, swinging open its boot lid in 2007 to reveal a more generous 405 litres and an impressive leap to 1670 litres when folding down the seats. That's enough room to throw in a couple of corgis and the Queen's sceptre – should you be so inclined.
The boot space compared to other Land Rover models
In the family portrait of Land Rover, the Freelander giggles in the corner with its 405 litres, while its more sophisticated siblings stare down with larger trunks. The Range Rover Evoque struts in with a suave 472 litres, the Discovery Sport makes a bolder statement with 541 litres, and the Range Rover Velar shows off with 552 litres. Meanwhile, the Range Rover Sport flexes an impressive 647 litres, and the Defender goes full British Empire with a cavernous 786 litres. Finally, as if to casually drop the mic, the Range Rover boasts a boot fit for a monarch with a stately 818 litres. The poor Freelander could only gaze upward in boot space envy.
How does the boot space of the Land Rover Freelander compare to it's nearest competitors?
Now, let's set the scene with some friendly competition, shall we? Stand back as the Freelander goes boot-to-boot with rivals from around the globe. Our dear Freelander grins with 405 litres, while the Jeep Compass lags behind at 334 litres – slightly embarrasing, really. The Honda CR-V, with a rather apologetic offering of 374 litres, refuses to make eye contact, while the Mitsubishi Outlander hurries past, nearly on par with 402 litres. In a twist of fate, the Citroen C5 Aircross glides in like a French duke with a superior 580 litres, putting the Freelander in its humble place. Comparatively, the Nissan X-Trail parades 410 litres, and the VW Tiguan comes in matching the Evoque with 470 litres – somewhat reassuring for those who prefer a Teutonic touch to their crossover. Lastly, let's not overlook the Lancia Lybra, an Italian stallion trotting in with a slightly higher offering of 420 litres – bravo!
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport 2005958 l
- SsangYong Rexton 2003935 l
- Cadillac XT4 2020637 l
- Hyundai Grand Santa Fe 2013634 l
- SsangYong Kyron 2005625 l
- Ford Edge 2016602 l
- Hyundai ix55 2009598 l
- Jaguar E-Pace 2018577 l
- DS Automobiles DS 7 2022555 l
- ALPINA XD3 2013550 l
- KIA Sorento 2009531 l
- ALPINA XD4 2021525 l
- Skoda Karoq 2017521 l
- Mercedes-Benz GLC 2015505 l
- BMW X1 2015505 l
- Volvo XC60 2008495 l
- SEAT Ateca 2020485 l
- Hyundai Santa Fe 2001469 l
- BMW X5 2000465 l
- Renault Koleos 2008450 l
- Citroen C-Crosser 2007441 l
- Infiniti QX30 2016430 l
- Mercedes-Benz GLA 2014421 l
- Peugeot 4008 2012416 l
- Ford Kuga 2008410 l
- Land Rover Freelander 2012405 l
- KIA Retona 1999394 l
- Dodge Nitro 2007389 l
- Hyundai Tucson 2004325 l
Similar cars
