Comparison: combined consumption (NEDC) Ford Ranger vs. competitors 2025

1.Generation 1999
Ranger 1. Generation (1. Facelift) 2002
2.Generation 2007
2.Generation (1. Facelift) 2009
Ranger 3. Generation 2011
Ranger 3. Generation (1. Facelift) 2016
Ranger 3. Generation (2. Facelift) 2019
Ranger 4. Generation 2022

Table of contents:

Ford Ranger - What is the combined consumption (nedc) of different engines?

Ford Ranger engines
  • Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 125 kW0 l/100km
  • Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Limited 4x4 {automatic} 125 kW0 l/100km
  • Doppelkabine 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 151 kW0 l/100km
  • Raptor 2.0 EcoBlue e-4WD {automatic} 154 kW0 l/100km
  • Doppelkabine 3.0 EcoBlue Wildtrack e-4WD {automatic} 177 kW0 l/100km
  • Doppelkabine 2.3 EcoBoost PHEV XLT e-4WD {automatic} 207 kW0 l/100km
  • Raptor 3.0 EcoBoost e-4WD {automatic} 215 kW0 l/100km

Variants

Ford Ranger variants: Ranger vs. Ranger Raptor
  • Ranger0 l/100km
  • Ranger Raptor0 l/100km

The combined consumption (nedc) compared to other Ford models

Ford Ranger vs other current cars by Ford
  • Fiesta ST 1.5 EcoBoost Styling-Paket 147 kW4 l/100km
    4.0
  • Fiesta Active ST 1.5 EcoBoost Styling-Paket 147 kW4 l/100km
    4.0
  • Transit Connect Kombi {VAN} 210 L2 1.5 EcoBlue Basis 55 kW4 l/100km
    4.0
  • EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line 103 kW5 l/100km
    5.0
  • Transit Courier {VAN} {VAN} 1.5 TDCi Limited 55 kW5 l/100km
    5.0
  • Transit Courier Kombi {VAN} 1.5 TDCi Limited 55 kW5 l/100km
    5.0
  • Tourneo Courier 1.0 EcoBoost Ambiente 74 kW5 l/100km
    5.0
  • Transit Kombi Kombi 350 L2 2.0 TDCi Trend 77 kW6 l/100km
    6.0
  • Kuga 2.0 EcoBoost Start/Stopp Titanium 4x4 {automatic} 178 kW6 l/100km
    6.0
  • Ranger Extrakabine 2.0 TDCi Stormtrak 4x4 {automatic} 156 kW6 l/100km
    6.0
  • Transit Custom {VAN} Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW6 l/100km
    6.0
  • Transit Custom Kombi Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW6 l/100km
    6.0
  • Transit Custom Kombi Nugget Kombi 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Mild-Hybrid Trend 77 kW6 l/100km
    6.0
  • Tourneo Custom 320 L1 2.0 EcoBlue Trend 136 kW6 l/100km
    6.0
  • Ranger Raptor Extrakabine 2.0 TDCi Stormtrak 4x4 {automatic} 156 kW8 l/100km
    8.0
  • Mustang Convertible Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost {automatic} 213 kW9 l/100km
    9.0
  • Mustang Fastback Convertible 2.3 EcoBoost {automatic} 213 kW12 l/100km
    12.0

How does the combined consumption (nedc) of the Ford Ranger compare to it's nearest competitors?

Ford Ranger vs. similar cars
  • fiat LogoFiat Tipo Kombi 1.3 Multijet 20204 l/100km
    4.0
  • ford LogoFord Transit Kombi 310 L2 2.0 TDCi 20196 l/100km
    6.0
  • fiat LogoFiat Ducato Kombi 30 kurz 115 Multijet 20146 l/100km
    6.0

Similar cars

VW Nutzfahrzeuge Amarok
VW Nutzfahrzeuge Amarok
2023 • T1
Body type
Pickup Truck
Length
5350 mm
Width
1910 mm
Height
1871 mm
Wheelbase
3270 mm
Weight
2262 kg
Doors
4
Compare
KGM Musso
KGM Musso
2025 • QK
Body type
Pickup Truck
Length
5095 mm
Width
1950 mm
Height
1840 mm
Wheelbase
3100 mm
Weight
2145 kg
Doors
4
Compare
Toyota Hilux
Toyota Hilux
toyota Logo 2020 • AN1P
Body type
Pickup Truck
Length
5325 mm
Width
1800 mm
Height
1795 mm
Wheelbase
3085 mm
Weight
1960 kg
Doors
2
Compare
Maxus T60 MAX
Maxus T60 MAX
2025 • SK8C
Body type
Pickup Truck
Length
5395 mm
Width
1960 mm
Height
1870 mm
Wheelbase
3155 mm
Weight
2275 kg
Doors
4
Compare
Isuzu D-Max
Isuzu D-Max
isuzu Logo 2024 • BTF
Body type
Pickup Truck
Length
5280 mm
Width
1870 mm
Height
1790 mm
Wheelbase
3125 mm
Weight
2055 kg
Doors
2
Compare
Maxus eTERRON 9
Maxus eTERRON 9
2025 • EKK1C
Body type
Pickup Truck
Length
5500 mm
Width
1997 mm
Height
1860 mm
Wheelbase
3300 mm
Weight
2925 kg
Doors
4
Compare
Maxus T90 EV
Maxus T90 EV
2023 • SK8C
Body type
Pickup Truck
Length
5365 mm
Width
1900 mm
Height
1809 mm
Wheelbase
3155 mm
Weight
2375 kg
Doors
4
Compare
Citroen Holidays
Citroen Holidays
citroen Logo 2024 • V
Body type
Motorhome
Length
4981 mm
Width
2010 mm
Height
1990 mm
Wheelbase
3275 mm
Weight
2235 kg
Doors
5
Compare
Fiat Scudo
Fiat Scudo
fiat Logo 2024 • Typ 507
Body type
Van
Length
4980 mm
Width
1920 mm
Height
1895 mm
Wheelbase
3275 mm
Weight
1791 kg
Doors
4
Compare
Ford Transit
Ford Transit
ford Logo 2019 • F*D
Body type
Bus
Length
5531 mm
Width
2059 mm
Height
2533 mm
Wheelbase
3300 mm
Weight
2311 kg
Doors
4
Compare
Toyota Proace
Toyota Proace
toyota Logo 2024 • V
Body type
Bus
Length
4983 mm
Width
1920 mm
Height
1890 mm
Wheelbase
3275 mm
Weight
1835 kg
Doors
4
Compare
Ford Tourneo Custom
Ford Tourneo Custom
ford Logo 2023 • NXN
Body type
Bus
Length
5050 mm
Width
2032 mm
Height
1958 mm
Wheelbase
3100 mm
Boot capacity
672 l
Weight
2251 kg
Doors
4
Compare
Ford Transit Custom
Ford Transit Custom
ford Logo 2023 • NXN
Body type
Van
Length
5050 mm
Width
2032 mm
Height
1958 mm
Wheelbase
3100 mm
Weight
1893 kg
Doors
4
Compare

Compare with ...

Find the Perfect Match
Compare your car with other models
TOPlist